COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. A comparison of morbidity and mortality results with laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Laparoscopic applications in hysterectomy promise to be a factor in decreasing both economic and medical morbidity. However, with the need for both advanced laparoscopic skills and good vaginal surgical techniques, the meaningful conversion rate (total abdominal hysterectomy to laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy) appears to be low. A less morbid approach may be subtotal hysterectomy, in appropriate candidates, particularly if this procedure is readily accomplished by an increased number of physicians. A comparison of outcomes in 50 laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy patients versus 50 laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy patients was made, demonstrating that the subtotal procedure was significantly less morbid.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

Managing Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome.Annals of Emergency Medicine 2024 March 26

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app