We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients.
Radiology 1994 January
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients were examined with US and CT, and the results, independently reported, were correlated with surgical and histopathologic findings (69 patients) and data from other laboratory and clinical follow-up (31 patients).
RESULTS: Fifty-four patients had acute appendicitis; 46 patients did not. Analysis of the data for CT and US, respectively, revealed sensitivity, 96% versus 76%; specificity, 89% versus 91%; accuracy, 94% versus 83%; positive predictive value, 96% versus 95%; and negative predictive value, 95% versus 76%. In the 46 patients without appendicitis, an alternative diagnosis was made with CT in 22 patients and with US in 15. CT scans showed abscesses and/or phlegmons in 28% of patients with appendicitis versus 17% at US. Results of CT and US were discordant in 20 patients; CT findings were correct in 17 and US findings in three.
CONCLUSION: CT is more accurate than US in diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients were examined with US and CT, and the results, independently reported, were correlated with surgical and histopathologic findings (69 patients) and data from other laboratory and clinical follow-up (31 patients).
RESULTS: Fifty-four patients had acute appendicitis; 46 patients did not. Analysis of the data for CT and US, respectively, revealed sensitivity, 96% versus 76%; specificity, 89% versus 91%; accuracy, 94% versus 83%; positive predictive value, 96% versus 95%; and negative predictive value, 95% versus 76%. In the 46 patients without appendicitis, an alternative diagnosis was made with CT in 22 patients and with US in 15. CT scans showed abscesses and/or phlegmons in 28% of patients with appendicitis versus 17% at US. Results of CT and US were discordant in 20 patients; CT findings were correct in 17 and US findings in three.
CONCLUSION: CT is more accurate than US in diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Demystifying normal-anion-gap metabolic acidosis: pathophysiology, aetiology, evaluation and diagnosis.Internal Medicine Journal 2024 July
Evolving Treatment Strategies for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Clinical Practice: A Narrative Review.Curēus 2024 December
Point-of-care ultrasound in Gastroenterology and Hepatology.Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2025 January 8
Nutritional Support in the ICU.BMJ : British Medical Journal 2025 January 2
Elective peri-operative management of adults taking glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors: a multidisciplinary consensus statement: A consensus statement from the Association of Anaesthetists, Association of British Clinical Diabetologists, British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society, Centre for Perioperative Care, Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care, Royal College of Anaesthetists, Society for Obesity and Bariatric Anaesthesia and UK Clinical Pharmacy Association.Anaesthesia 2025 January 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2025 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app