We have located links that may give you full text access.
Nasojejunal feeding tube placement in children: four-year cumulative experience.
Radiology 1994 January
PURPOSE: Experience with fluoroscopically guided nasojejunal feeding tube placement in children was assessed regarding clinical diagnosis, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, success rate, and placement failures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1987 to 1991, 562 nasojejunal tubes were placed in 232 patients aged 1 week to 24 years (mean, 3 1/2 years) at the authors' institution. In every case, an 8-F feeding tube system was inserted. The fluoroscopy times and tube placement positions were evaluated in all cases.
RESULTS: The mean fluoroscopy time was 5 minutes 30 seconds, which corresponded to an estimated mean midline fluoroscopy dose of 0.32 cGy. The tube was placed at or distal to the duodenojejunal junction in 543 attempts, for a success rate of 97%. The most common cause for unsuccessful tube placement was malrotation, with the fluoroscopic time and radiation dose significantly (P < .001) prolonged in these cases.
CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopic guidance of placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes in children is successful, but the radiation exposure is not negligible and must be weighed against the need for nasojejunal feeding.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1987 to 1991, 562 nasojejunal tubes were placed in 232 patients aged 1 week to 24 years (mean, 3 1/2 years) at the authors' institution. In every case, an 8-F feeding tube system was inserted. The fluoroscopy times and tube placement positions were evaluated in all cases.
RESULTS: The mean fluoroscopy time was 5 minutes 30 seconds, which corresponded to an estimated mean midline fluoroscopy dose of 0.32 cGy. The tube was placed at or distal to the duodenojejunal junction in 543 attempts, for a success rate of 97%. The most common cause for unsuccessful tube placement was malrotation, with the fluoroscopic time and radiation dose significantly (P < .001) prolonged in these cases.
CONCLUSION: Fluoroscopic guidance of placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes in children is successful, but the radiation exposure is not negligible and must be weighed against the need for nasojejunal feeding.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app