We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Decompression for degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis at L4-5. The effects on facet joint morphology.
Spine 1993 September 2
Anatomic variations exist in the facet joint orientation, shape, and size at L4-5. This morphology is further modified by degenerative changes in spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. This study explored the morphologic alteration of "pedicle-to-pedicle" decompression on the facet joints in normal patients, spinal stenosis patients, and degenerative spondylolisthesis patients. Using computerized digitization, computed tomographic scan images of the facet joint at L4-5 and the medial border of the pedicle at L5 were superimposed. The facet joint orientation, coronal dimension, percentage, and absolute reduction in coronal dimension after pedicle-to-pedicle decompression, and residual coronal dimension after decompression at L4-5 were measured for the three groups. There is a significantly reduced coronal dimension of the facet joint in degenerative spondylolisthesis patients compared with spinal stenosis and normal patients (P < 0.01). The average reduction of the facet joint coronal dimension is 34% (SD 30%) in degenerative spondylolisthesis, and 36% (SD 25%) in spinal stenosis. The smaller preoperative coronal dimension in degenerative spondylolisthesis leads to a significantly reduced residual coronal dimension in degenerative spondylolisthesis compared with normal patients (5.9 mm [SD 4.3 mm] vs. 9.3 mm [SD 3.5 mm]), respectively. Wide variations in facet joint reduction and residual facet joint coronal dimension exist. The significantly reduced coronal dimension after decompression in degenerative spondylolisthesis may be correlated to a trend to further anterior displacement if it is treated with decompression alone. Case-specific assessment of residual facet joint morphology after decompression in both spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis patients should be integrated into decisions about fusion for stability at the L4-5 level.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app