We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Effect of organic effectors on chromatin solubility, DNA-histone H1 interactions, DNA and histone H1 structures.
Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics 1993 August
We have extended our previous investigations on the effect of organic osmolytes (glycine, proline, taurine, mannitol, sorbitol and trimethylammonium oxide (TMAO)) on chromatin solubility, to the study of their influence on DNA stability and DNA-histone interactions. Our aim was to understand the molecular origin of the protection effects observed. To this end, we determined the amount of histone H1 required to precipitate DNA or H1-depleted chromatin, at various salt concentrations, in the presence of the above mentioned organic compounds. We found a shift of the H1/DNA ratio required to reach 50% precipitation, towards higher values. Taurine was the most efficient compound followed by mannitol and glycine, then sorbitol and proline. On the contrary, TMAO favoured the precipitation process. We attempted to interpret these results on the basis of Manning's counterion condensation theory. Changes in histone H1 structure folding and in DNA melting temperature Tm were also analyzed. Glycine, taurine, sorbitol and TMAO increased the degree of secondary structure folding of the protein while mannitol and sorbitol had no effect. Taurine, glycine and proline decreased the Tm of DNA, TMAO largely destabilized DNA, but mannitol and sorbitol had no effect. Measurements of NaCl activity in the presence of organic osmolytes did not reveal sufficiently large changes to account for their protection effect against chromatin precipitation. The osmotic coefficient j of the organic effectors solutions increased in the order: taurine < glycine < sorbitol < mannitol < proline < TMAO. For the two latter compounds, the j values increased above 1 at high concentration. We consider that the organic compounds investigated may be classified into three categories: (i) class I (zwitterionic compounds: glycine, proline, taurine) would produce sodium ions release from the DNA surface; (ii) class II (the very polar molecule TMAO) would increase sodium counterions condensation on DNA together with histone H1 folding; (iii) class III compounds (mannitol and sorbitol) would possibly produce a modification of NaCl activity but no definite explanation could be found for the complex behavior of these compounds.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app