JOURNAL ARTICLE
Diagnostic accuracy of peritoneal lavage in patients with pelvic fractures.
Archives of Surgery 1994 May
OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) for the evaluation of intraabdominal injury in patients with a pelvic fracture as a result of blunt trauma.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis.
SETTING: Level I trauma center in metropolitan Seattle, Wash.
PATIENTS: Four hundred ninety-seven consecutive patients admitted with pelvic fractures following blunt trauma during a 60-month period.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Positive results of DPL, defined by one of the following: an immediate aspiration of more than 10 mL of gross blood; a red blood cell count of more than 0.0001 x 10(12)/L; a white blood cell count greater than 0.0005 x 10(9)/L; an elevated amylase, bilirubin, or creatinine level; or organic particles or bacteria in the effluent returned after installation of 1 L of crystalloid fluid lavaged in the peritoneal cavity.
RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-six patients underwent DPL. For 80 patients (28.0%), results of DPL were positive and for 194 patients (67.8%) the results of DPL were negative. For two patients (0.7%), results of DPL were false positive for a sensitivity of 94%. For another two patients (0.7%), the results of DPL were false negative for a specificity of 99%. As a diagnostic modality, DPL has a positive predictive value of 98% and a negative predictive value of 97%.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is a reliable method for the evaluation of intra-abdominal injury and should remain a standard component in the evaluation of patients following blunt injury with or without pelvic fractures.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis.
SETTING: Level I trauma center in metropolitan Seattle, Wash.
PATIENTS: Four hundred ninety-seven consecutive patients admitted with pelvic fractures following blunt trauma during a 60-month period.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Positive results of DPL, defined by one of the following: an immediate aspiration of more than 10 mL of gross blood; a red blood cell count of more than 0.0001 x 10(12)/L; a white blood cell count greater than 0.0005 x 10(9)/L; an elevated amylase, bilirubin, or creatinine level; or organic particles or bacteria in the effluent returned after installation of 1 L of crystalloid fluid lavaged in the peritoneal cavity.
RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-six patients underwent DPL. For 80 patients (28.0%), results of DPL were positive and for 194 patients (67.8%) the results of DPL were negative. For two patients (0.7%), results of DPL were false positive for a sensitivity of 94%. For another two patients (0.7%), the results of DPL were false negative for a specificity of 99%. As a diagnostic modality, DPL has a positive predictive value of 98% and a negative predictive value of 97%.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is a reliable method for the evaluation of intra-abdominal injury and should remain a standard component in the evaluation of patients following blunt injury with or without pelvic fractures.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Management of Hemorrhagic Shock: Physiology Approach, Timing and Strategies.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2022 December 30
New antibiotics for Gram-negative pneumonia.European Respiratory Review : An Official Journal of the European Respiratory Society 2022 December 32
Migraine.Annals of Internal Medicine 2023 January 11
How to diagnose iron deficiency in chronic disease: A review of current methods and potential marker for the outcome.European Journal of Medical Research 2023 January 10
New therapies for obesity.Cardiovascular Research 2022 November 31
Diabetic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes: a consensus statement from the Swiss Societies of Diabetes and Nephrology.Swiss Medical Weekly 2023 January 7
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app