We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Head extension and laryngeal view during laryngoscopy with cervical spine stabilization maneuvers.
Anesthesiology 1994 April
BACKGROUND: Direct laryngoscopy frequently is modified in patients with known or suspected cervical spine injury. The goals of this study were to measure the degrees of head extension required to expose the arytenoid cartilages and glottis if neck flexion were not possible and to determine whether in-line stabilization maneuvers alter the amount of head extension.
METHODS: The subjects were anesthesized patients with normal cervical spines and Mallampati class 1 oropharyngeal views. Head extension was measured relative to a line drawn perpendicular to the table. Stabilization consisted of either passive immobilization, with the head held flat against a rigid board, or axial traction.
RESULTS: Without stabilization, arytenoid cartilage exposure and the best view of the glottis was achieved with a 10 +/- 5 degree (mean +/- SD) head extension and a 15 +/- 6 degree head extension, respectively (n = 31). Head immobilization reduced extension angles 4 +/- 5 degrees for arytenoid exposure and 5 +/- 6 degrees for best view compared with no stabilization.
CONCLUSIONS: Head immobilization reduced head extension necessary for laryngoscopy. If head extension is construed to be potentially dangerous in patients with cervical spine injuries, head immobilization without traction might be the preferable stabilization technique.
METHODS: The subjects were anesthesized patients with normal cervical spines and Mallampati class 1 oropharyngeal views. Head extension was measured relative to a line drawn perpendicular to the table. Stabilization consisted of either passive immobilization, with the head held flat against a rigid board, or axial traction.
RESULTS: Without stabilization, arytenoid cartilage exposure and the best view of the glottis was achieved with a 10 +/- 5 degree (mean +/- SD) head extension and a 15 +/- 6 degree head extension, respectively (n = 31). Head immobilization reduced extension angles 4 +/- 5 degrees for arytenoid exposure and 5 +/- 6 degrees for best view compared with no stabilization.
CONCLUSIONS: Head immobilization reduced head extension necessary for laryngoscopy. If head extension is construed to be potentially dangerous in patients with cervical spine injuries, head immobilization without traction might be the preferable stabilization technique.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app