COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Diagnosis in adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease. Prospective assessment of individual and combined roles of magnetic resonance imaging and transesophageal echocardiography.

Circulation 1994 December
BACKGROUND: The inability to obtain complete diagnoses with transthoracic echocardiography in many adults with congenital heart disease provided the incentive to evaluate prospectively the individual and combined roles of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as "second-line" techniques for unresolved diagnostic problems.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were studied; 81 had MRI with a 0.5-T magnet to obtain spin-echo images, cine-MRI, and flow-velocity maps. Seventy-nine patients had TEE (37 biplane). A simple score (range, 0 to 1) was used for quantification of the results of MRI and TEE alone, for their comparison (in the 75 patients who had both), and for assessment of their combination. MRI, TEE, or their combination achieved a score of at least 0.75 in 18 of 25 diagnostic categories. A summary of the scores showed that for intracardiac anatomy. MRI scored 0.34, TEE scored 0.71 (P < .0001), and MRI plus TEE scored 0.84 (P < .003); for extracardiac anatomy, MRI scored 0.76, TEE scored 0.23 (P < .0001), and MRI plus TEE scored 0.84 (P = NS); and for hemodynamics and function, MRI scored 0.58, TEE scored 0.41 (P < .05), and MRI plus TEE scored 0.67 (P = NS). Total scores were MRI, 0.52; TEE, 0.50 (P = NS); and MRI plus TEE, 0.80 (P < .0001). MRI and TEE were inadequate for collateral and coronary arteries and pulmonary vascular resistance. Cine-MRI and flow-velocity maps comprised 43% of the MRI scores. Biplane TEE was better than single plane (scores of 0.59 versus 0.42, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS: MRI and TEE are important and complementary "second-line" investigations for congenital heart disease. Analysis of their performance in a wide range of diagnostic categories provides guidelines for their judicious application. Where both are available, diagnostic catheterizations are either obviated or simplified.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app