We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Response of Bitot's spots to a single oral 100,000- or 200,000-IU dose of vitamin A.
American Journal of Ophthalmology 1994 December 16
PURPOSE: A randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted in Indonesia to study the response of Bitot's spots to a 100,000-IU dose of vitamin A, which is known to be associated with fewer acute side effects than the currently recommended 200,000-IU dose.
METHODS: A total of 114 children (ages 13 to 59 months) with Bitot's spots were given an ocular examination; serum retinol concentration was measured, and the relative dose response test carried out. After administering one 100,000- or 200,000-IU oral dose of vitamin A, ocular examinations were repeated weekly for seven weeks and then biweekly for 20 more weeks, or until lesions were healed on two consecutive examinations.
RESULTS: Either dose of vitamin A was similarly effective in healing Bitot's spots. The most important factor in predicting responsiveness to treatment was baseline serum retinol concentration: children with lower pretreatment concentrations were more likely to have responsive lesions. No child had a relapse within the first three months after treatment. However, by six months, children who had received the higher dose were 82% less likely to have a relapse compared with children who had received the lower dose.
CONCLUSIONS: Although either a 100,000- or 200,000-IU dose of vitamin A is similarly effective in healing Bitot's spots, a 200,000-IU dose provides longer protection. This benefit justifies the higher rates of transient mild side effects associated with the 200,000-IU dose. The current 200,000-IU dose of vitamin A recommended by the World Health Organization for prophylactic dosing should not be reduced.
METHODS: A total of 114 children (ages 13 to 59 months) with Bitot's spots were given an ocular examination; serum retinol concentration was measured, and the relative dose response test carried out. After administering one 100,000- or 200,000-IU oral dose of vitamin A, ocular examinations were repeated weekly for seven weeks and then biweekly for 20 more weeks, or until lesions were healed on two consecutive examinations.
RESULTS: Either dose of vitamin A was similarly effective in healing Bitot's spots. The most important factor in predicting responsiveness to treatment was baseline serum retinol concentration: children with lower pretreatment concentrations were more likely to have responsive lesions. No child had a relapse within the first three months after treatment. However, by six months, children who had received the higher dose were 82% less likely to have a relapse compared with children who had received the lower dose.
CONCLUSIONS: Although either a 100,000- or 200,000-IU dose of vitamin A is similarly effective in healing Bitot's spots, a 200,000-IU dose provides longer protection. This benefit justifies the higher rates of transient mild side effects associated with the 200,000-IU dose. The current 200,000-IU dose of vitamin A recommended by the World Health Organization for prophylactic dosing should not be reduced.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app