We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
An analysis of sagittal curves and balance after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann's disease. A review of 32 patients.
Spine 1994 August 2
STUDY DESIGN: This study compared preoperative and postoperative saggittal curves and spinal balance in patients undergoing spinal fusion with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for severe kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann's disease. Also determined was patient satisfaction regarding relief of pain and correction of the deformity. Thirty two patients with kyphosis > 75 degrees underwent spinal fusion with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the initial and long-term correction of the primary kyphosis and changes in lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance, and to determine the incidence and etiology of junctional sagittal deformities.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The average preoperative kyphosis was 85 degrees (range, 75 degrees to 105 degrees) with an average correction at final follow-up of 43 degrees (range, 26 degrees to 65 degrees). Preoperative lumbar lordosis averaged 75 degrees (range, 58 degrees to 100 degrees) and at final follow-up averaged 55 degrees (range, 23 degrees to 74 degrees). Most of the patients demonstrated negative sagittal balance and became slightly more negatively balanced postoperatively.
RESULTS: Maintenance of correction postoperatively was excellent, with only a 4 degree average loss of correction. There was spontaneous reduction in lumbar lordosis of varying degrees. Proximal junctional kyphosis was associated with over-correction (> 50%) of the kyphotic deformity or a fusion starting short of the proximal vertebra in the measured kyphosis. Distal junctional kyphosis developed in patients whose fusion ended short of the first lordotic segment.
CONCLUSIONS: This procedure appeared to yield good results when proper levels of fusion were selected and correction > 50% was not attempted.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the initial and long-term correction of the primary kyphosis and changes in lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance, and to determine the incidence and etiology of junctional sagittal deformities.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The average preoperative kyphosis was 85 degrees (range, 75 degrees to 105 degrees) with an average correction at final follow-up of 43 degrees (range, 26 degrees to 65 degrees). Preoperative lumbar lordosis averaged 75 degrees (range, 58 degrees to 100 degrees) and at final follow-up averaged 55 degrees (range, 23 degrees to 74 degrees). Most of the patients demonstrated negative sagittal balance and became slightly more negatively balanced postoperatively.
RESULTS: Maintenance of correction postoperatively was excellent, with only a 4 degree average loss of correction. There was spontaneous reduction in lumbar lordosis of varying degrees. Proximal junctional kyphosis was associated with over-correction (> 50%) of the kyphotic deformity or a fusion starting short of the proximal vertebra in the measured kyphosis. Distal junctional kyphosis developed in patients whose fusion ended short of the first lordotic segment.
CONCLUSIONS: This procedure appeared to yield good results when proper levels of fusion were selected and correction > 50% was not attempted.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app