We have located links that may give you full text access.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Complicated colonic diverticulosis. Changes in treatment and results over 22 years].
La Presse Médicale 1994 May 15
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse the clinical course, surgical strategy and results in patients with complicated colonic diverticular disease.
METHODS: We retrospectively compared two groups of patients who underwent surgery for complicated colonic diverticulosis from 1970 to 1984 (Group A, n = 94, mean age 60 years, 49 males, 45 females) and from 1985 to 1992 (Group B, n = 76, mean age 63.5, 32 males, 44 females).
RESULTS: Patients in the two groups were comparable; only the rate of peritonitis (20 vs 8%) was different (p < 0.05). The most frequent operations in Group A were colostomy-drainage (43%) and Hartman's procedure (26%) in emergency situations and resection with immediate anastomosis (63%) or resection-anastomosis with diverting stomy (19%) in elective cases. In Group B, surgical strategy led to a different pattern of operations, 4 and 56% in emergency, and 94 and 2% in elective surgery, respectively. Overall mortality was 11%, with 17% and 4% in Groups A and B respectively (p < 0.01). This major drop in mortality was particularly important in emergency cases (31 vs 4%; p < 0.02). Morbidity in emergency surgery fell from 21 to 4% (P < 0.0006). Interrupting the use of colostomy-drainage was a major factor in reducing mortality followed by a sharp fall in mortality after Hartmann's procedure (28.5 vs 0%).
CONCLUSION: The marked improvement in results between the two groups was mainly due to preferring resections of pathological colonic segments over colostomy-drainage.
METHODS: We retrospectively compared two groups of patients who underwent surgery for complicated colonic diverticulosis from 1970 to 1984 (Group A, n = 94, mean age 60 years, 49 males, 45 females) and from 1985 to 1992 (Group B, n = 76, mean age 63.5, 32 males, 44 females).
RESULTS: Patients in the two groups were comparable; only the rate of peritonitis (20 vs 8%) was different (p < 0.05). The most frequent operations in Group A were colostomy-drainage (43%) and Hartman's procedure (26%) in emergency situations and resection with immediate anastomosis (63%) or resection-anastomosis with diverting stomy (19%) in elective cases. In Group B, surgical strategy led to a different pattern of operations, 4 and 56% in emergency, and 94 and 2% in elective surgery, respectively. Overall mortality was 11%, with 17% and 4% in Groups A and B respectively (p < 0.01). This major drop in mortality was particularly important in emergency cases (31 vs 4%; p < 0.02). Morbidity in emergency surgery fell from 21 to 4% (P < 0.0006). Interrupting the use of colostomy-drainage was a major factor in reducing mortality followed by a sharp fall in mortality after Hartmann's procedure (28.5 vs 0%).
CONCLUSION: The marked improvement in results between the two groups was mainly due to preferring resections of pathological colonic segments over colostomy-drainage.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app