COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation: a comparison of three equations employed for estimating fetal weight.

This study was conducted to compare the accuracy in estimating the fetal weight of three equations with ultrasound in 104 pregnant women. Equation I log 10 (EFW) = 1.85479 + 0.09008 (BPD) + 0.02466 (AC) Equation II log 10 (EFW) = 2.24784 + 0.09122 (FL) + 0.002798 (BPD x AC) -0.0010112 (AC x FL) Equation III log 10 (EFW) = -1.7492 + 0.166 (BPD) + 0.046 (AC) - 2.646 (AC x BPD)/1000 There was no difference in either the overall mean errors of 95 per cent CI among the three equations, except in the least error for equation II in these with birthweight of less than 2,000 grams and for equation III in these with birthweight of more than 3,000 grams. It was concluded, therefore, that predictions based on either equation I or II developed from local Thai population, which have an almost identical overall mean error when compared with one another or with Shepard's (i.e. equation III), can be used in our clinical.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app