META-ANALYSIS
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A review of scrotal violation in testicular cancer: is adjuvant local therapy necessary?

High inguinal orchiectomy is the standard initial treatment for suspected testicular carcinoma. Nonstandard surgical approaches (scrotal violations), including scrotal orchiectomy, open testicular biopsy and fine needle aspiration, have historically been condemned as significantly compromising patient prognosis. Patients with scrotal violation are often subjected to potentially morbid or disfiguring local therapies. In addition, patients with scrotal violations are usually disqualified from surveillance protocols. A review was conducted of all published series of testicular cancer patients in whom scrotal violation occurred. A meta-analysis was then performed to choose a subset for critical analysis on the effect of scrotal violation on patient prognosis. Of 1,182 cases included in the final analysis scrotal violation occurred in 206. The rates for local recurrence, distant recurrence and survival were analyzed separately for all patients, patients with stage I disease and patients with pure seminoma or nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. Additionally, the effect of local treatment for scrotal violation on prognosis was examined. Although statistically significant differences were found in the local recurrence rate among the scrotal violation and inguinal group studies, the overall local recurrence rates were small (2.9% versus 0.4%, respectively). There were no statistical differences in distant recurrence or survival rates in all groups analyzed. Patients with scrotal violation who did not receive any local therapy fared as well as those who did receive local therapy. Although the standard treatment of primary testicular cancer remains high inguinal orchiectomy, these data suggest that scrotal violation does not impart a significantly worse overall prognosis. These data would also indicate that patients with stage I disease and scrotal violation should not necessarily be disqualified from surveillance protocols or subjected to adjuvant local therapy.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Group 7SearchHeart failure treatmentPapersTopicsCollectionsEffects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Patients With Heart Failure Importance: Only 1 class of glucose-lowering agents-sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors-has been reported to decrease the risk of cardiovascular events primarily by reducingSeptember 1, 2017: JAMA CardiologyAssociations of albuminuria in patients with chronic heart failure: findings in the ALiskiren Observation of heart Failure Treatment study.CONCLUSIONS: Increased UACR is common in patients with heart failure, including non-diabetics. Urinary albumin creatininineJul, 2011: European Journal of Heart FailureRandomized Controlled TrialEffects of Liraglutide on Clinical Stability Among Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Review

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app