We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Active decompression improves the haemodynamic state during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
British Heart Journal 1995 April
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether use of the active compression-decompression device improves the haemodynamics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with those of conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
DESIGN: Prospective crossover study.
SETTING: The accident and emergency department of a university teaching hospital.
PATIENTS: 36 adult patients with non-traumatic, normothermic, out of hospital cardiac arrest.
INTERVENTIONS: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed during resuscitation in alternating 3 min cycles of conventional and active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), femoral arterial pressure, and acid-base analysis of central venous blood measured during the last 30 s of each 3 minute cardiopulmonary resuscitation cycle.
RESULTS: ETCO2 was monitored in 36 patients during conventional and active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation caused a significant increase in ETCO2 (P < 0.0002), indicating improved cardiac output. Arterial pressure measurement was carried out in 10 patients. Systolic pressure was significantly greater with active compression-decompression than conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (P < 0.007). Central venous blood was taken for acid-base analysis in 11 patients. There was a significant increase in the central venous hydrogen ion concentration (P = 0.025) with rises in the partial pressures of carbon dioxide and oxygen, suggesting improved venous return.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation is associated with better haemodynamic status than conventional resuscitation.
DESIGN: Prospective crossover study.
SETTING: The accident and emergency department of a university teaching hospital.
PATIENTS: 36 adult patients with non-traumatic, normothermic, out of hospital cardiac arrest.
INTERVENTIONS: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed during resuscitation in alternating 3 min cycles of conventional and active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), femoral arterial pressure, and acid-base analysis of central venous blood measured during the last 30 s of each 3 minute cardiopulmonary resuscitation cycle.
RESULTS: ETCO2 was monitored in 36 patients during conventional and active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation caused a significant increase in ETCO2 (P < 0.0002), indicating improved cardiac output. Arterial pressure measurement was carried out in 10 patients. Systolic pressure was significantly greater with active compression-decompression than conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (P < 0.007). Central venous blood was taken for acid-base analysis in 11 patients. There was a significant increase in the central venous hydrogen ion concentration (P = 0.025) with rises in the partial pressures of carbon dioxide and oxygen, suggesting improved venous return.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation is associated with better haemodynamic status than conventional resuscitation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app