CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Placebo-controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil combined with cyclosporin and corticosteroids for prevention of acute rejection. European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group.

Lancet 1995 May 28
Preliminary studies suggested that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), which inhibits proliferation of T and B cells, may reduce the frequency of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Our randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy and safety of MMF with placebo for prevention of acute rejection episodes after first or second cadaveric renal allograft transplantation. 491 patients were enrolled; 166 were assigned placebo, 165 MMF 2 g, and 160 MMF 3 g. Patients also received cyclosporin and corticosteroids. Significantly fewer (p < or = 0.001) patients had biopsy-proven rejection or withdrew early from the trial (for any reason) during the first 6 months after transplantation with MMF 2 g (30.3%) or 3 g (38.8%) than with placebo (56.0%). The corresponding percentages for biopsy-proven rejection were 17.0%, 13.8%, and 46.4%. 28.5% of MMF 2 g and 24.4% of MMF 3 g patients needed full courses of corticosteroids or antilymphocyte agents for treatment of rejection episodes in the first 6 months, compared with 51.8% of placebo recipients. By 6 months, 10.2%, 6.7%, and 8.8% of the patients in the placebo, MMF 2 g, and MMF 3 g groups, respectively, had died or lost the graft. Overall, the frequency of adverse events was similar in all treatment groups, although gastrointestinal problems, leucopenia, and opportunistic infections were more common in the MMF groups and there was a trend for more events in the 3 g than the 2 g group. MMF significantly reduced the rate of biopsy-proven rejection or other treatment failure during the first 6 months after transplantation and was well tolerated. The 3 g dose was somewhat less well tolerated.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app