Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Carotid-subclavian bypass for brachiocephalic occlusive disease. Choice of conduit and long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Atherosclerotic disease of the proximal brachiocephalic circulation may produce disabling symptoms referable to cerebral or upper extremity hypoperfusion and embolization. Bypass of occlusive lesions can provide durable relief of symptoms with minimal complications. The ideal conduit for carotid-to-subclavian and subclavian-to-carotid bypass remains controversial, and it is not clear whether the outflow vessel influences patency and survival.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 60 consecutive carotid-to-subclavian and subclavian-to-carotid bypass procedures. Occlusive lesions were documented preoperatively by arteriography. Patency was determined during follow-up by ultrasound or duplex examination. Actuarial patency, symptom-free survival, and overall survival rates were calculated by the life-table method and analyzed by log-rank test.

RESULTS: Arterial transposition demonstrated the highest long-term patency rate (100.0 +/- 0.0%). Polytetrafluoroethylene grafts demonstrated the highest bypass graft patency rate (95.2 +/- 4.6%), followed by Dacron grafts (83.9 +/- 10.5%) and saphenous vein grafts (64.8 +/- 16.5%). Symptom-free survival paralleled patency rates, but these differences did not achieve statistical significance. While there were no differences in patency or symptom-free survival by outflow vessel, the overall survival of patients with common carotid lesions was significantly lower than that of patients with subclavian lesions (62.7 +/- 12.8% versus 100.0 +/- 0.0%; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS: The outflow vessel does not affect long-term patency in carotid and subclavian bypass procedures; however, patients with common carotid disease demonstrate significantly poorer long-term survival. Transposition results in superior long-term patency, with a trend toward lower results for synthetic grafts and relatively poor results for autogenous vein grafts.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app