We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Continuous versus frequent intermittent nebulization of albuterol in acute asthma: a randomized, prospective study.
Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 1995 July
BACKGROUND: In acute severe asthma the optimal dose, frequency, duration and method of administration of beta-2 agonists is unknown. No study to date has evaluated the efficacy of high dose beta-2 agonists beyond the initial two hours.
OBJECTIVE: (1) To determine whether high-dose continuous nebulization of albuterol (7.5 mg/h) is as safe and as efficacious as high-dose intermittent nebulization of albuterol (2.5 mg every 20 minutes) for four hours. (2) To evaluate whether there is a continual improvement using high dose therapy beyond two hours.
METHODS: We devised a simple means of continuous nebulization calibrated to deliver 7.5 mg albuterol per hour. Twenty-two nonsmoking, patients with acute, severe asthma who presented to the emergency department with less than 60% predicted normal PEFR were randomized to either the continuous or intermittent group. All patients received intravenously 125 mg methyl prednisolone on initiation of the study. No theophylline was administered. Spirometry and vital signs were measured at baseline and every 30 minutes thereafter. Electrocardiograms were obtained on all patients and all patients had continuous cardiac monitoring.
RESULTS: Both groups doubled their baseline spirometric values over the four-hour period (P < .0001). The FEV1 did not differ significantly between regimens at any time interval. Improvement from 120 minutes to 240 minutes was statistically significant (P < .0001). There was no significant difference in vital signs at the end of the study compared with baseline in either group, nor between the two groups at any time interval.
CONCLUSION: High-dose continuous nebulization of albuterol is as safe and as efficacious as intermittent nebulization of albuterol in the early treatment of asthma in an emergency department. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing continued significant improvement beyond the initial two hours of therapy using high dose nebulized beta-2 agonists.
OBJECTIVE: (1) To determine whether high-dose continuous nebulization of albuterol (7.5 mg/h) is as safe and as efficacious as high-dose intermittent nebulization of albuterol (2.5 mg every 20 minutes) for four hours. (2) To evaluate whether there is a continual improvement using high dose therapy beyond two hours.
METHODS: We devised a simple means of continuous nebulization calibrated to deliver 7.5 mg albuterol per hour. Twenty-two nonsmoking, patients with acute, severe asthma who presented to the emergency department with less than 60% predicted normal PEFR were randomized to either the continuous or intermittent group. All patients received intravenously 125 mg methyl prednisolone on initiation of the study. No theophylline was administered. Spirometry and vital signs were measured at baseline and every 30 minutes thereafter. Electrocardiograms were obtained on all patients and all patients had continuous cardiac monitoring.
RESULTS: Both groups doubled their baseline spirometric values over the four-hour period (P < .0001). The FEV1 did not differ significantly between regimens at any time interval. Improvement from 120 minutes to 240 minutes was statistically significant (P < .0001). There was no significant difference in vital signs at the end of the study compared with baseline in either group, nor between the two groups at any time interval.
CONCLUSION: High-dose continuous nebulization of albuterol is as safe and as efficacious as intermittent nebulization of albuterol in the early treatment of asthma in an emergency department. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing continued significant improvement beyond the initial two hours of therapy using high dose nebulized beta-2 agonists.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app