We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Improved oxygenation with reduced recirculation during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: evaluation of a test catheter.
Critical Care Medicine 1995 October
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether modifications of the original design of a double-lumen, venovenous, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) catheter would reduce recirculation and improve oxygenation during venovenous ECMO.
DESIGN: Prospective, interventional study.
SETTING: The animal research laboratory at The Children's National Medical Center.
SUBJECTS: Six newborn lambs, 1 to 7 days old and weighing 4.7 +/- 0.9 kg.
INTERVENTIONS: Animals were anesthetized, intubated and ventilated. The ductus arteriosus was ligated. Femoral artery and vein, cephalic jugular vein, and pulmonary artery catheters were placed. After systemic heparinization, the test catheter (with venous drainage holes moved away from the arterial return holes) was placed in the right internal jugular vein and advanced into the right atrium. The animal was placed on ECMO and stabilized, with the ventilator settings decreased to a peak inspiratory pressure of 15 cm H2O, peak positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O, respiratory rate of 15 breaths/min, and an FIO2 of 0.21. ECMO flows were increased in 100-mL increments from 200 to 600 mL/min, with measurements taken 15 mins after each change. The test catheter was removed, the double-lumen, venovenous ECMO catheter was placed, and the studies were repeated.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, PaO2, jugular cerebral oxygen saturation, pulmonary artery oxygen saturation, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and postmembrane circuit pressures were measured at each study period. The test catheter improved oxygenation significantly, with higher systemic PaO2, higher pulmonary artery and cerebral oxygen saturations, and lower mixed venous oxygen saturations (indicating less recirculation). With the test catheter, PaO2 levels ranged from 62 +/- 6 torr (8.3 +/- 0.8 kPa) to 112 +/- 12 torr (14.9 +/- 1.6 kPa), compared with 46 +/- 4 torr (6.1 +/- 0.5 kPa) to 59 +/- 2 torr (7.9 +/- 0.3 kPa) for the double-lumen, venovenous ECMO catheter (p < or = .001). These findings indicate that at all flow rates studied, less recirculation occurred with the test catheter than with the double-lumen, venovenous ECMO catheter.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the redesign of the double-lumen, venovenous ECMO catheter, as outlined in this study, resulted in a significant reduction of recirculation, thereby resulting in a significant improvement in oxygenation while on venovenous ECMO. This newly designed catheter makes venovenous ECMO more effective, and represents a design that could be used for pediatric and/or adult ECMO.
DESIGN: Prospective, interventional study.
SETTING: The animal research laboratory at The Children's National Medical Center.
SUBJECTS: Six newborn lambs, 1 to 7 days old and weighing 4.7 +/- 0.9 kg.
INTERVENTIONS: Animals were anesthetized, intubated and ventilated. The ductus arteriosus was ligated. Femoral artery and vein, cephalic jugular vein, and pulmonary artery catheters were placed. After systemic heparinization, the test catheter (with venous drainage holes moved away from the arterial return holes) was placed in the right internal jugular vein and advanced into the right atrium. The animal was placed on ECMO and stabilized, with the ventilator settings decreased to a peak inspiratory pressure of 15 cm H2O, peak positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O, respiratory rate of 15 breaths/min, and an FIO2 of 0.21. ECMO flows were increased in 100-mL increments from 200 to 600 mL/min, with measurements taken 15 mins after each change. The test catheter was removed, the double-lumen, venovenous ECMO catheter was placed, and the studies were repeated.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, PaO2, jugular cerebral oxygen saturation, pulmonary artery oxygen saturation, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and postmembrane circuit pressures were measured at each study period. The test catheter improved oxygenation significantly, with higher systemic PaO2, higher pulmonary artery and cerebral oxygen saturations, and lower mixed venous oxygen saturations (indicating less recirculation). With the test catheter, PaO2 levels ranged from 62 +/- 6 torr (8.3 +/- 0.8 kPa) to 112 +/- 12 torr (14.9 +/- 1.6 kPa), compared with 46 +/- 4 torr (6.1 +/- 0.5 kPa) to 59 +/- 2 torr (7.9 +/- 0.3 kPa) for the double-lumen, venovenous ECMO catheter (p < or = .001). These findings indicate that at all flow rates studied, less recirculation occurred with the test catheter than with the double-lumen, venovenous ECMO catheter.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the redesign of the double-lumen, venovenous ECMO catheter, as outlined in this study, resulted in a significant reduction of recirculation, thereby resulting in a significant improvement in oxygenation while on venovenous ECMO. This newly designed catheter makes venovenous ECMO more effective, and represents a design that could be used for pediatric and/or adult ECMO.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app