We have located links that may give you full text access.
Reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint using a temporalis graft with or without simultaneous orthognathic surgery.
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1995 November
PURPOSE: This article reports the outcome of free temporalis fascia and muscle graft (TFG) reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with and without simultaneous orthognathic surgery (SOS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (45 joints) were evaluated retrospectively. Group 1 consisted of 17 patients (16 women 1 man) and 30 joints. Fifteen (88%) patients had sagittal split ramus osteotomies (SSRO); 8 (53%) of these patients also had Le Fort I osteotomies, and 2 patients (12%) had only Le Fort I osteotomies with TFG. Group 2 consisted of 12 patients (15 joints) who received only TFG and no SOS.
RESULTS: Group 1 had 9 patients (53%) with an incisal opening greater than 35 mm, 11 joints (37%) with greater than 6 mm lateral excursive movement, and 11 patients (65%) were asymptomatic postoperatively. Average follow-up was 57.4 months (range, 23 to 69 months). Group 2 had eight patients (67%) with an incisal opening greater than 35 mm, six joints (40%) with greater than 6 mm lateral excursive movement, and seven patients (58%) were asymptomatic postoperatively. Average follow-up was 55.1 months (range, 48 to 64 months).
CONCLUSION: TFG with and without SOS produced similar treatment outcomes in comparing groups 1 and 2. No significant differences were observed for the number of patients with an incisal opening > 35 mm (P = .703), lateral excursion > 6 mm (P = 1.00), and successful elimination of pain (P = 1.00), even though group 2 had a significantly greater number of patients (P < 0.01) that were operated on unilaterally. Combining treatment outcomes for both groups, the number of previous joint surgeries significantly affected success (P < .01). The presence of osteoarthritic changes did-not significantly affect treatment outcome (P = .187).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (45 joints) were evaluated retrospectively. Group 1 consisted of 17 patients (16 women 1 man) and 30 joints. Fifteen (88%) patients had sagittal split ramus osteotomies (SSRO); 8 (53%) of these patients also had Le Fort I osteotomies, and 2 patients (12%) had only Le Fort I osteotomies with TFG. Group 2 consisted of 12 patients (15 joints) who received only TFG and no SOS.
RESULTS: Group 1 had 9 patients (53%) with an incisal opening greater than 35 mm, 11 joints (37%) with greater than 6 mm lateral excursive movement, and 11 patients (65%) were asymptomatic postoperatively. Average follow-up was 57.4 months (range, 23 to 69 months). Group 2 had eight patients (67%) with an incisal opening greater than 35 mm, six joints (40%) with greater than 6 mm lateral excursive movement, and seven patients (58%) were asymptomatic postoperatively. Average follow-up was 55.1 months (range, 48 to 64 months).
CONCLUSION: TFG with and without SOS produced similar treatment outcomes in comparing groups 1 and 2. No significant differences were observed for the number of patients with an incisal opening > 35 mm (P = .703), lateral excursion > 6 mm (P = 1.00), and successful elimination of pain (P = 1.00), even though group 2 had a significantly greater number of patients (P < 0.01) that were operated on unilaterally. Combining treatment outcomes for both groups, the number of previous joint surgeries significantly affected success (P < .01). The presence of osteoarthritic changes did-not significantly affect treatment outcome (P = .187).
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app