We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography].
Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia 1995 July
BACKGROUND: The simple determination of transaortic pressure gradient does not accurately assess the severity of an aortic valve stenosis. Thus, estimating the aortic valve area (AVA) is vital for clinical decision-making. Cardiac catheterization has been considered the "gold-standard" for the quantification of the stenotic valve area, but this technique may underestimate the actual valve area when aortic regurgitation is associated. Doppler transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with the continuity equation method is usually employed for AVA estimation. Recently, in pure aortic stenosis, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has provided AVA values well-correlated to hemodynamic invasive results.
METHODS: In this study, we correlated AVA values by TTE and multiplane TEE in 18 patients with combined aortic valve stenosis and regurgitation.
RESULTS: The mean values of AVA by TEE and TTE were 0.74 +/- 0.12 and 0.68 +/- 0.55 cm2, respectively (p = NS). TEE-derived AVA correlated well to TTE-derived AVA (r = 0.816; p < 0.0001). Critical aortic stenosis was predicted by TEE with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Total time of examination was significantly longer for TTE (p < 0.00001).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, direct planimetry by multiplane TEE is a reliable method for AVA determination in aortic stenoinsufficiency. For this purpose, when the technical quality of TTE study is poor or when the patient is critically ill and does not tolerate a longer lasting TTE, multiplane TEE should be considered.
METHODS: In this study, we correlated AVA values by TTE and multiplane TEE in 18 patients with combined aortic valve stenosis and regurgitation.
RESULTS: The mean values of AVA by TEE and TTE were 0.74 +/- 0.12 and 0.68 +/- 0.55 cm2, respectively (p = NS). TEE-derived AVA correlated well to TTE-derived AVA (r = 0.816; p < 0.0001). Critical aortic stenosis was predicted by TEE with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Total time of examination was significantly longer for TTE (p < 0.00001).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, direct planimetry by multiplane TEE is a reliable method for AVA determination in aortic stenoinsufficiency. For this purpose, when the technical quality of TTE study is poor or when the patient is critically ill and does not tolerate a longer lasting TTE, multiplane TEE should be considered.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app