We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Randomized study of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for high-risk lymphoid malignancies.
Journal of Clinical Oncology 1994 September
PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to examine the efficacy and safety of filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with poor-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or relapsed Hodgkin's disease were treated in a randomized, open-label trial to study the use of filgrastim as an adjunct to high-dose chemotherapy and ABMT. Of 43 assessable patients, 19 were randomized to receive filgrastim by continuous subcutaneous infusion at a dose of 10 micrograms/kg/d, 10 to filgrastim 20 micrograms/kg/d, and 14 to a parallel control group that received no filgrastim after ABMT.
RESULTS: For all filgrastim-treated patients analyzed together, the median time to neutrophil recovery > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/L after the day of ABMT was significantly accelerated to 10 days compared with 18 days in control patients (P = .0001). The median number of platelet transfusions was identical in both groups. Clinical parameters, including the median number of days with fever (1 v 4, P = .0418) and neutropenic fever (5 v 13.5, P = .0001) were significantly shorter in the filgrastim than in the control group. The number of days on intravenous antibiotics and duration of hospitalization were also shorter in the treated groups; however, the differences did not reach statistical significance. For patients treated with the two different dose levels of filgrastim, the neutrophil recovery and clinical results were similar. Filgrastim-associated toxicity appeared to be minimal, with five adverse events considered at least possibly related to filgrastim: two in the higher-dose group and three in the lower-dose group. All of these were rated moderate, except one case of severe bone pain that did not preclude continued filgrastim treatment at a lower dose. Survival and relapse-free survival were similar for control and filgrastim-treated patients.
CONCLUSION: Taken together, the results of this first randomized study support the role of filgrastim given as an adjunct to ABMT in accelerating neutrophil recovery, as well as in reducing treatment-related morbidity and overall duration of the treatment procedure.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with poor-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or relapsed Hodgkin's disease were treated in a randomized, open-label trial to study the use of filgrastim as an adjunct to high-dose chemotherapy and ABMT. Of 43 assessable patients, 19 were randomized to receive filgrastim by continuous subcutaneous infusion at a dose of 10 micrograms/kg/d, 10 to filgrastim 20 micrograms/kg/d, and 14 to a parallel control group that received no filgrastim after ABMT.
RESULTS: For all filgrastim-treated patients analyzed together, the median time to neutrophil recovery > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/L after the day of ABMT was significantly accelerated to 10 days compared with 18 days in control patients (P = .0001). The median number of platelet transfusions was identical in both groups. Clinical parameters, including the median number of days with fever (1 v 4, P = .0418) and neutropenic fever (5 v 13.5, P = .0001) were significantly shorter in the filgrastim than in the control group. The number of days on intravenous antibiotics and duration of hospitalization were also shorter in the treated groups; however, the differences did not reach statistical significance. For patients treated with the two different dose levels of filgrastim, the neutrophil recovery and clinical results were similar. Filgrastim-associated toxicity appeared to be minimal, with five adverse events considered at least possibly related to filgrastim: two in the higher-dose group and three in the lower-dose group. All of these were rated moderate, except one case of severe bone pain that did not preclude continued filgrastim treatment at a lower dose. Survival and relapse-free survival were similar for control and filgrastim-treated patients.
CONCLUSION: Taken together, the results of this first randomized study support the role of filgrastim given as an adjunct to ABMT in accelerating neutrophil recovery, as well as in reducing treatment-related morbidity and overall duration of the treatment procedure.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app