We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Safety of hypertensive hypervolemic therapy with phenylephrine in the treatment of delayed ischemic deficits after subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 1995 December
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypertensive hypervolemic therapy has been shown to reverse delayed ischemic deficits after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Concern has been raised about systemic complications of therapy, including pulmonary edema and myocardial ischemia, especially when high doses of vasopressors are used. Patients in whom delayed ischemic deficits were treated with hypervolemia and phenylephrine were prospectively evaluated for signs of systemic toxicity.
METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients treated with hypertensive hypervolemic therapy after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were studied. Sixty-seven percent had underlying cardiac disease, vascular disease, or hypertension. No patient was excluded because of age or preexisting cardiac disease. Patients were closely monitored for signs of congestive heart failure (physical examination, chest x-ray films, arterial blood gases, cardiac index, pulmonary artery wedge pressure, and oxygen requirement). Indicators of cardiac ischemia and other extracerebral toxicity that were monitored included cardiac enzymes, electrocardiograms, serum creatinine, electrolyte and lactic acid levels, gastrointestinal motility, and urine output.
RESULTS: Volume expansion and phenylephrine infusion produced an increase in several hemodynamic parameters including pulmonary artery wedge pressure, which rose 28% (13 +/- 3.6 to 16 +/- 1.9 mm Hg), mean arterial blood pressure, which rose 25% (99 +/- 12.5 to 123 +/- 11.4 mm Hg), and systemic vascular resistance, which rose 46% (1234 +/- 294 to 1739 +/- 315 dyne.s-1.cm-5); however, there was no change in cardiac index (3.9 +/- 0.9 to 4.0 +/- 0.6 L.min-1.m-2). There were no clinically significant episodes of pulmonary edema requiring a change in vasopressor therapy and no myocardial infarctions. Phenylephrine was stopped in only one patient (incidence, 4%; 95% confidence interval, 0% to 12%), who developed an exacerbation of his preexisting bradycardia. There was no evidence of noncardiac organ system toxicity. Eighty-eight percent of the patients exhibited neurological improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Hypertensive hypervolemic therapy with the use of high-dose phenylephrine can be administered with acceptable systemic toxicity, even in patients with previous cardiac disease, provided that close monitoring is performed. To minimize risk, aggressive treatment should probably be reserved for patients with signs of delayed ischemia rather than administered prophylactically.
METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients treated with hypertensive hypervolemic therapy after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were studied. Sixty-seven percent had underlying cardiac disease, vascular disease, or hypertension. No patient was excluded because of age or preexisting cardiac disease. Patients were closely monitored for signs of congestive heart failure (physical examination, chest x-ray films, arterial blood gases, cardiac index, pulmonary artery wedge pressure, and oxygen requirement). Indicators of cardiac ischemia and other extracerebral toxicity that were monitored included cardiac enzymes, electrocardiograms, serum creatinine, electrolyte and lactic acid levels, gastrointestinal motility, and urine output.
RESULTS: Volume expansion and phenylephrine infusion produced an increase in several hemodynamic parameters including pulmonary artery wedge pressure, which rose 28% (13 +/- 3.6 to 16 +/- 1.9 mm Hg), mean arterial blood pressure, which rose 25% (99 +/- 12.5 to 123 +/- 11.4 mm Hg), and systemic vascular resistance, which rose 46% (1234 +/- 294 to 1739 +/- 315 dyne.s-1.cm-5); however, there was no change in cardiac index (3.9 +/- 0.9 to 4.0 +/- 0.6 L.min-1.m-2). There were no clinically significant episodes of pulmonary edema requiring a change in vasopressor therapy and no myocardial infarctions. Phenylephrine was stopped in only one patient (incidence, 4%; 95% confidence interval, 0% to 12%), who developed an exacerbation of his preexisting bradycardia. There was no evidence of noncardiac organ system toxicity. Eighty-eight percent of the patients exhibited neurological improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Hypertensive hypervolemic therapy with the use of high-dose phenylephrine can be administered with acceptable systemic toxicity, even in patients with previous cardiac disease, provided that close monitoring is performed. To minimize risk, aggressive treatment should probably be reserved for patients with signs of delayed ischemia rather than administered prophylactically.
Full text links
Trending Papers
2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Circulation 2023 November 31
How we approach titrating PEEP in patients with acute hypoxemic failure.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2023 October 32
ANCA-associated vasculitis - Treatment Standard.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2023 November 9
The alternative renin-angiotensin system in critically ill patients: pathophysiology and therapeutic implications.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2023 November 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app