CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Tibial pilon fractures: a comparative clinical study of management techniques and results.

Orthopedics 1995 July
Thirty-eight consecutive pilon fractures were reviewed retrospectively to compare the radiographic and clinical results with the original injuries based on three different treatment options: external fixation only, external fixation with limited internal fixation, and internal fixation only. Dates of injury were from February 1985 to February 1989. Treatment method was the surgeon's preference. The mean follow-up time was 28 months. Results were tabulated by clinical and radiographic scores. In general, simple fracture types had good results; complex ones did less well. In this study, fracture severity appeared to be the key variable in outcome.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app