We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Tibial pilon fractures: a comparative clinical study of management techniques and results.
Orthopedics 1995 July
Thirty-eight consecutive pilon fractures were reviewed retrospectively to compare the radiographic and clinical results with the original injuries based on three different treatment options: external fixation only, external fixation with limited internal fixation, and internal fixation only. Dates of injury were from February 1985 to February 1989. Treatment method was the surgeon's preference. The mean follow-up time was 28 months. Results were tabulated by clinical and radiographic scores. In general, simple fracture types had good results; complex ones did less well. In this study, fracture severity appeared to be the key variable in outcome.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app