Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A comparative study of bilateral versus unilateral congenital dislocation of the hip.

The presentations, treatment requirements, results, and complications of 50 patients with bilateral congenital hip dislocation were evaluated and compared with a similar group of unilateral dislocations. Diagnosis was significantly delayed in the bilateral dislocations. The only consistent sign on initial clinical examination of the bilateral group was the symmetrical restriction of hip abduction. Treatment requirements were similar for the unilateral and bilateral dislocations, and in fact, the unilateral dislocations were more likely to undergo reconstructive procedure after successful closed reduction. Overall results, when based on age at diagnosis, were similar for the two groups. In both groups, females required less treatment and were more likely to have a good result. The complication of avascular necrosis was seen more frequently in the unilateral dislocation, while the bilateral dislocation had a higher incidence of inadequate reconstructive operations.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app