COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction response to exercise in aortic regurgitation.

To test the hypothesis that left ventricular (LV) performance in aortic regurgitation (AR) can be more completely characterized by measurement of LV volumes in addition to ejection fraction (EF), 27 asymptomatic patients (Group 1), and 22 symptomatic patients (Group 2), and 10 control subjects were studied at rest and during upright bicycle exercise using the first-pass technique and a multicrystal scintillation camera. LV end-diastolic volume was measured by the area-length method. In the control group end-diastolic volume increased 14%, end-systolic volume decreased 22%, and EF increased 22% with exercise. In contrast, in Group 1 patients with AR, end-diastolic volume was elevated at rest and during exercise. The 18% decrease in end-diastolic volume during exercise was significantly different from the control response (p less than 0.01). End-systolic volume was also elevated at rest and during exercise, but the 30% decrease during exercise was a response not significantly different from the control. Although mean EF increased 15% in these patients, EF at peak exercise was significantly lower than that in the controls. In Group 2 patients with AR, resting EF was reduced, the EF response to exercise was abnormal, and end-diastolic and end-systolic volume responses to exercise were significantly different from those in Group 1: end-diastolic volume did not change and end-systolic volume increased. In contrast to the fairly uniform volume responses among all Group 1 patients, there were 2 subgroups based on volume changes within Group 2: 7 of 22 had a decrease in end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume during exercise and 8 of 22 showed an increase in end-diastolic and end-systolic volume during exercise. In conclusion, LV volumes at rest and exercise give more information about LV functional reserve in symptomatic patients with AR than do EF responses alone, and may be useful in separating symptomatic patients who show a normal end-systolic volume response to exercise from those in whom worsening failure develops during exercise.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app