COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of lorazepam and diazepam in the treatment of the acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome.

The safety and efficacy of lorazepam and diazepam were compared in the treatment of the acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome during a five-day double-blind trial in alcoholic patients. The daily doses of lorazepam and diazepam were tapered from 6 or 8 mg to 2 mg and from 30 or 40 mg to 10 mg, respectively, during the first four days; no medication was given on day 5. Drug efficacy was measured by Total Severity Assessment Scores (TSAS), the three TSAS factor scores, and by the physician's global evaluation. Of the 55 inpatients enrolled, 47 completed the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups in any of the efficacy assessment measures. The physical conditions of the majority of the patients treated with lorazepam (57%) and diazepam (59%) improved during therapy. There were no clinically significant differences between the treatment groups in vital signs or laboratory values. The results of this study indicate that lorazepam is as effective as diazepam in reducing the symptoms of acute alcohol withdrawal. When lorazepam and diazepam are compared in terms of their pharmacokinetics, lorazepam may have therapeutic advantages for the management of the acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app