Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Abdominal wound closure--a comparison of monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid.

Surgery 1981 June
The incidence of burst abdomen, incisional herniation, and sinus formation after a vertical abdominal incision was studied in a prospective randomized trial that compared two suture materials--monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid. Laparotomy wounds were closed with a continuous mass suture technique. Of the 210 patients studied, 15 died between 10 days and 6 months postoperatively with their wounds intact. The remaining patients were followed up for 6 months or longer. The two groups were well matched for known risk factors. The 104 patients in the polyglycolic acid group had a 12.5% wound failure rate (1 burst abdomen and 12 hernias), but the 106 patients in the nylon group had only a 4.7% wound failure rate (1 burst abdomen and 4 hernias) (P = 0.04). There was a significant association between the rate of infection and sinus formation, but there was no difference between the incidence of these complications between the two groups. Closure of abdominal wounds with absorbable sutures does not appear to be justified, and we suggest that nylon and the mass closure technique be used for all abdominal wound closures. Other etiologic factors significantly associated with wound failure include male sex and postoperative chest complications. However, infection remains the most significant postoperative complication because the incidence of incisional hernias and sinus formation would be reduced by the elimination of wound sepsis.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app