Journal Article
Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Low VWF - unravelling an enigma wrapped in a conundrum.

The 2021 ASH ISTH NHF WFH guidelines recommendation that patients with VWF levels of 30-50 IU/dL and an increased bleeding phenotype be categorized as type 1 VWD rather than Low VWF has proved controversial. However, in support of that decision, recent data have demonstrated that individuals with partial quantitative VWF deficiency exhibit an age-dependent evolving phenotype and confirmed that Low VWF represents a sub-group within heterogeneous type 1 VWD. Nonetheless, type 1 VWD heterogeneity continues to pose significant diagnostic challenges. In this Forum Article, we address outstanding issues critical to preventing the inappropriate overdiagnosis of type 1 VWD, while maximizing access to healthcare and minimizing diagnostic delays. In addition, we propose an algorithm for type 1 VWD diagnosis. This algorithm pays special attention to individuals with plasma VWF levels in the 30-50 IU/dL range who have no or minimal bleeding history and have not yet been exposed to significant hemostatic challenges.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app