We have located links that may give you full text access.
T1 Pelvic and Lumbar Pelvic Angles Normative Values: A Prospective Cohort Study of 472 Asymptomatic Volunteers.
Spine 2024 September 11
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of a prospectively enrolled cohort.
OBJECTIVE: Determine the normative values of the T1 Pelvic Angle (TPA) and Lumbar Pelvic Angle (LPA) in an asymptomatic cohort of volunteers.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The TPA and LPA have been introduced as sagittal spino-pelvic parameters to guide correction of adult spinal deformity. Suggested values for these parameters were derived from linear regressions based on Oswestry Disability Index scores from adult spinal deformity patients. While a few studies have evaluated the normative value of TPA, none have evaluated the LPA in asymptomatic individuals.
METHODS: TPA and LPA were measured on radiographs of 472 asymptomatic volunteers between 20 and 40 years old. TPA and LPA were calculated as originally described from the centroid of T1 and L1 respectively, to the center of the femoral head to the midpoint of the sacral endplate. TPA and LPA were also evaluated using the midpoint of the superior endpoint as a surrogate to the centroid of the vertebra to compare these two measurement techniques.
RESULTS: TPA and LPA normative values were respectively 7.3 [6.8-7.8] and 6.3o [5.9-6.7]. There was no statistically significant difference between using the centroid of T1 or L1 versus using the midpoint of the superior endplate with respective results of 7.5o [7.0-8.0] (P=0.55) and 6.1o [5.6-6.5] (P=0.43). TPA was significantly different between Roussouly types 1-2-3 versus type 4 with respective results of of 6.7o, 7.2o, 6.5o and 9.2o (P<0.001). The same difference was observed for the LPA with normative results of 3.8o, 5.1o, 5.8o and 9.3o (P<0.001), respectively, for Roussouly types 1,2,3 and 4.
CONCLUSIONS: TPA and LPA normative values are 7o and 6o, respectively, and vary between Roussouly morphotypes 1,2 and 3 versus type 4. Using the midpoint of the superior endplate of T1 and L1 versus the centroid yielded similar results and therefore could be easier to use intraoperatively.
OBJECTIVE: Determine the normative values of the T1 Pelvic Angle (TPA) and Lumbar Pelvic Angle (LPA) in an asymptomatic cohort of volunteers.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The TPA and LPA have been introduced as sagittal spino-pelvic parameters to guide correction of adult spinal deformity. Suggested values for these parameters were derived from linear regressions based on Oswestry Disability Index scores from adult spinal deformity patients. While a few studies have evaluated the normative value of TPA, none have evaluated the LPA in asymptomatic individuals.
METHODS: TPA and LPA were measured on radiographs of 472 asymptomatic volunteers between 20 and 40 years old. TPA and LPA were calculated as originally described from the centroid of T1 and L1 respectively, to the center of the femoral head to the midpoint of the sacral endplate. TPA and LPA were also evaluated using the midpoint of the superior endpoint as a surrogate to the centroid of the vertebra to compare these two measurement techniques.
RESULTS: TPA and LPA normative values were respectively 7.3 [6.8-7.8] and 6.3o [5.9-6.7]. There was no statistically significant difference between using the centroid of T1 or L1 versus using the midpoint of the superior endplate with respective results of 7.5o [7.0-8.0] (P=0.55) and 6.1o [5.6-6.5] (P=0.43). TPA was significantly different between Roussouly types 1-2-3 versus type 4 with respective results of of 6.7o, 7.2o, 6.5o and 9.2o (P<0.001). The same difference was observed for the LPA with normative results of 3.8o, 5.1o, 5.8o and 9.3o (P<0.001), respectively, for Roussouly types 1,2,3 and 4.
CONCLUSIONS: TPA and LPA normative values are 7o and 6o, respectively, and vary between Roussouly morphotypes 1,2 and 3 versus type 4. Using the midpoint of the superior endplate of T1 and L1 versus the centroid yielded similar results and therefore could be easier to use intraoperatively.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app