We have located links that may give you full text access.
Mapping in healthy subjects different body areas for dermal thickness and skin hardness by high frequency ultrasound and durometry.
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 2024 August 27
OBJECTIVES: Body mapping of normal values of skin thickness and hardness may be a useful aid in daily practice. By employing non-invasive techniques, our pilot study provides these values in healthy individuals using high frequency ultrasound (HFUS) and durometry in areas used to evaluate the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS).
METHODS: One-hundred-fifty-two healthy volunteers from Ghent and Genova University Hospitals (mean ages 31.2, 35.5, and 64.9 years), were evaluated to exclude rheumatologic diseases. HFUS and durometry were used to assess the dermal status in mRSS areas. Exploratory analyses were performed to assess the impact of demographic and anthropometric characteristics on intra-subject skin measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with Datatab®.
RESULTS: The upper and lower arms exhibited significantly higher durometry values and lower dermal thickness compared to the trunk regions, underscoring distinct variations across these areas (all p<0.05). The hardest skin was found on the finger, while the thickest dermal measurements were at the abdomen and thighs. Dermal thickness was higher in men in multiple areas in the three cohorts, albeit with relatively modest effect sizes (r coefficients ranging between 0.02 and 0.6). Despite the presence of significant inter-group differences in dermal thickness, HFUS mapping showed similar topographical distributions in both centres.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study offers a comprehensive skin mapping status in healthy individuals. Key findings indicate lower dermal thickness in the upper arms, legs, and feet, and higher skin hardness in peripheral areas like fingers, compared to truncal regions.This skin mapping pilot study might provide the normal distribution values in outpatient clinics for physicians to be used when comparing the same areas in pathological conditions like systemic sclerosis-related fibrotic skin.
METHODS: One-hundred-fifty-two healthy volunteers from Ghent and Genova University Hospitals (mean ages 31.2, 35.5, and 64.9 years), were evaluated to exclude rheumatologic diseases. HFUS and durometry were used to assess the dermal status in mRSS areas. Exploratory analyses were performed to assess the impact of demographic and anthropometric characteristics on intra-subject skin measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with Datatab®.
RESULTS: The upper and lower arms exhibited significantly higher durometry values and lower dermal thickness compared to the trunk regions, underscoring distinct variations across these areas (all p<0.05). The hardest skin was found on the finger, while the thickest dermal measurements were at the abdomen and thighs. Dermal thickness was higher in men in multiple areas in the three cohorts, albeit with relatively modest effect sizes (r coefficients ranging between 0.02 and 0.6). Despite the presence of significant inter-group differences in dermal thickness, HFUS mapping showed similar topographical distributions in both centres.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study offers a comprehensive skin mapping status in healthy individuals. Key findings indicate lower dermal thickness in the upper arms, legs, and feet, and higher skin hardness in peripheral areas like fingers, compared to truncal regions.This skin mapping pilot study might provide the normal distribution values in outpatient clinics for physicians to be used when comparing the same areas in pathological conditions like systemic sclerosis-related fibrotic skin.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Central venous catheter insertion site and infection prevention in 2024.Intensive Care Medicine 2024 September 30
Novel Insights into Diabetic Kidney Disease.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 September 23
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension.European Heart Journal 2024 August 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app