We have located links that may give you full text access.
Food Processing According to the NOVA Classification is Not Associated with Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load: Results from an Analysis of 1,995 Food Items.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2024 August 27
BACKGROUND: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) comprise most calories in the United States diet. Glycemic index (GI) and load (GL) are measures of the quality and quantity of carbohydrates in food based on their effect on postprandial blood glucose. Diets high in UPFs and GI/GL are associated with chronic metabolic diseases but the relationship between them is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine the GI and GL of foods assigned to NOVA food processing groups. We hypothesized that GI and GL would be lowest in minimally processed foods (MPF) compared to processed (PRF) and UPF (with no difference between PRF and UPF).
METHODS: GI and GL values produced by healthy individuals for 1,995 food items were collated from published sources. Food items were manually coded by processing levels according to NOVA Classification. In addition, as the effects of processing on glycemic potential may vary between types of foods, food items were coded into eight groups (Beans, Nuts, and Seeds; Beverages; Dairy; Fats and Sweets; Fruit; Grains; Fish, Meat, and Poultry; and Vegetables). Multilevel linear modeling was used to determine significance with an alpha value of 0.05.
RESULTS: The effect of food processing on GI and GL was contrary to our hypothesis as means did not differ significantly across processing levels: GI (MPF: 54.1 ± 19.5, PRF: 53.2 ± 18.9, UPF: 49.3 ± 18.1; p=0.712), GL: (MPF: 17.1 ± 10.3, PRF: 15.8 ± 12.4, UPF; 11.5 ± 7.9; p=0.890). Within food groups, there was no significant association between food processing groups and GI (p=0.184), but GL was inversely and positively associated with grains and vegetables, respectively (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Across analyzed foods, GI and GL did not differ between processing levels, with mixed findings for grains and vegetables. Any potential adverse outcomes associated with UPF are unlikely to be related to effects on glycemia.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine the GI and GL of foods assigned to NOVA food processing groups. We hypothesized that GI and GL would be lowest in minimally processed foods (MPF) compared to processed (PRF) and UPF (with no difference between PRF and UPF).
METHODS: GI and GL values produced by healthy individuals for 1,995 food items were collated from published sources. Food items were manually coded by processing levels according to NOVA Classification. In addition, as the effects of processing on glycemic potential may vary between types of foods, food items were coded into eight groups (Beans, Nuts, and Seeds; Beverages; Dairy; Fats and Sweets; Fruit; Grains; Fish, Meat, and Poultry; and Vegetables). Multilevel linear modeling was used to determine significance with an alpha value of 0.05.
RESULTS: The effect of food processing on GI and GL was contrary to our hypothesis as means did not differ significantly across processing levels: GI (MPF: 54.1 ± 19.5, PRF: 53.2 ± 18.9, UPF: 49.3 ± 18.1; p=0.712), GL: (MPF: 17.1 ± 10.3, PRF: 15.8 ± 12.4, UPF; 11.5 ± 7.9; p=0.890). Within food groups, there was no significant association between food processing groups and GI (p=0.184), but GL was inversely and positively associated with grains and vegetables, respectively (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Across analyzed foods, GI and GL did not differ between processing levels, with mixed findings for grains and vegetables. Any potential adverse outcomes associated with UPF are unlikely to be related to effects on glycemia.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Ten tips to manage oral anticoagulation in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation.Clinical Kidney Journal 2024 October
New strategies for the treatment of hyperkalemia.European Journal of Internal Medicine 2024 November 2
Mixed Cardiogenic Shock: A Proposal for Standardized Classification, a Hemodynamic Definition, and Framework for Management.Circulation 2024 October 29
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app