We have located links that may give you full text access.
Shedding Light on the Black Box of Rehabilitation: Differential Short- and Long-Term Effects of Multidisciplinary Multiple Sclerosis Rehabilitation.
International Journal of MS Care 2024 May
BACKGROUND: The study of the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR) and how the symptoms and needs of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) interplay with the diversity of MDR interventions is still a conundrum, often referred to as a black box.
METHODS: We conducted a partial crossover randomized controlled trial with follow-ups at 1 (discharge), 6, and 12 months. Based on their rehabilitation goals, each patient was categorized into 1 of 5 main focus areas (MFAs) prior to admission: Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs. The Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) instrument scores were the primary outcome.
RESULTS: MFA groups varied in age ( P = .036), MS type ( P = .002), Expanded Disability Status Scale score ( P < .001), time since diagnosis ( P = .002), and FAMS at baseline ( P < .001), as well as in composition and quantity of MDR services. At discharge, significant FAMS improvements were found in all 5 MFA groups (FAMS change > 10.4, P < .05), but the affected subdimensions and persistence of improvements varied among MFA groups. At the 6-month follow-up, estimates of controlled differences in FAMS were 9.9 ( P =.001), 5.6 ( P = .196), 8.5 ( P = .008), -1.4 ( P = .548), and 17.9 ( P = .012) for the Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that inpatient MDR improves functioning and health-related quality of life in people with MS; the type, degree, and persistence of the benefits are associated with a patient's main focus area of rehabilitation, which signifies the importance of the goal-setting process in MDR.
METHODS: We conducted a partial crossover randomized controlled trial with follow-ups at 1 (discharge), 6, and 12 months. Based on their rehabilitation goals, each patient was categorized into 1 of 5 main focus areas (MFAs) prior to admission: Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs. The Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) instrument scores were the primary outcome.
RESULTS: MFA groups varied in age ( P = .036), MS type ( P = .002), Expanded Disability Status Scale score ( P < .001), time since diagnosis ( P = .002), and FAMS at baseline ( P < .001), as well as in composition and quantity of MDR services. At discharge, significant FAMS improvements were found in all 5 MFA groups (FAMS change > 10.4, P < .05), but the affected subdimensions and persistence of improvements varied among MFA groups. At the 6-month follow-up, estimates of controlled differences in FAMS were 9.9 ( P =.001), 5.6 ( P = .196), 8.5 ( P = .008), -1.4 ( P = .548), and 17.9 ( P = .012) for the Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that inpatient MDR improves functioning and health-related quality of life in people with MS; the type, degree, and persistence of the benefits are associated with a patient's main focus area of rehabilitation, which signifies the importance of the goal-setting process in MDR.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
2024 Guideline for the Primary Prevention of Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2024 October 21
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria, Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Treatment.Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy 2024 October
The Role of Natriuretic Peptides in the Management of Heart Failure with a Focus on the Patient with Diabetes.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 October 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app