Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Effects of oral contrast agent on the viscoelastic properties of the terminal ileum investigated using magnetic resonance elastography.

BACKGROUND: While standard clinical magnetic resonance (MR) enterography can detect inflammatory bowel disease, it is of limited value in deciding between medical versus surgical treatment. Alternatively, intestinal MR elastography has the potential to contribute additional information to therapeutic decision-making; however, the influence of bowel distension by oral contrast agent on viscoelastic tissue properties remains elusive. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the influence of oral contrast agent-induced bowel distension on the viscoelastic properties of the terminal ileum in healthy volunteers.

METHODS: In this prospective pilot study, 20 healthy volunteers (33.2±8.2 years; 10 men, 10 women) underwent multifrequency MR elastography using a single-shot spin-echo echo planar imaging sequence at 1.5 Tesla and drive frequencies of 40, 50, 60 and 70 Hz. Maps of shear wave speed ( c in ms-1 ) and loss angle ( φ in rad), representing stiffness and viscous properties, respectively, were generated using tomoelastography data processing. The volunteers were scanned before and after ingestion of 1,000 mL of 2% mannitol solution as oral contrast agent.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terminal ileum biomechanical properties before vs. after ingestion of an oral contrast agent (mean c : 1.47±0.24 vs. 1.40±0.25 ms-1 with P=0.37; mean φ : 0.70±0.12 rad vs. 0.68±0.12 rad with P=0.61). Moreover, there was no statistically significant correlation between MR elastography parameters before and after the ingestion of oral contrast ( c : r =0.22, P=0.36; φ : r =0.24, P=0.30).

CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that bowel distension for intestinal MR elastography has no systematic effect on the biomechanical tissue properties of the terminal ileum determined by MR elastography. Therefore, future study protocols appear feasible with or without oral contrast agents.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app