We have located links that may give you full text access.
Decoding Radiology Reports: Artificial Intelligence-Large Language Models Can Improve the Readability of Hand and Wrist Orthopedic Radiology Reports.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an Artificial Intelligence-Large Language Model (AI-LLM) at improving the readability of hand and wrist radiology reports.
METHODS: The radiology reports of 100 hand and/or wrist radiographs, 100 hand and/or wrist computed tomography (CT) scans, and 100 hand and/or wrist magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were extracted. The following prompt command was inserted into the AI-LLM: "Explain this radiology report to a patient in layman's terms in the second person: [Report Text]." The report length, Flesch reading ease score (FRES), and Flesch-Kincaid reading level (FKRL) were calculated for the original radiology report and the AI-LLM-generated report. The accuracy of the AI-LLM report was assessed via a 5-point Likert scale. Any "hallucination" produced by the AI-LLM-generated report was recorded.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant improvement in mean FRES scores and FKRL scores in the AI-LLM-generated radiograph report, CT report, and MRI report. For all AI-LLM-generated reports, the mean reading level improved to below an eighth-grade reading level. The mean Likert score for the AI-LLM-generated radiograph report, CT report, and MRI report was 4.1 ± 0.6, 3.9 ± 0.6, and 3.9 ± 0.7, respectively. The hallucination rate in the AI-LLM-generated radiograph report, CT report, and MRI report was 3%, 6%, and 6%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that AI-LLM effectively improves the readability of hand and wrist radiology reports, underscoring the potential application of AI-LLM as a promising and innovative patient-centric strategy to improve patient comprehension of their imaging reports. Level of Evidence: IV.
METHODS: The radiology reports of 100 hand and/or wrist radiographs, 100 hand and/or wrist computed tomography (CT) scans, and 100 hand and/or wrist magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were extracted. The following prompt command was inserted into the AI-LLM: "Explain this radiology report to a patient in layman's terms in the second person: [Report Text]." The report length, Flesch reading ease score (FRES), and Flesch-Kincaid reading level (FKRL) were calculated for the original radiology report and the AI-LLM-generated report. The accuracy of the AI-LLM report was assessed via a 5-point Likert scale. Any "hallucination" produced by the AI-LLM-generated report was recorded.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant improvement in mean FRES scores and FKRL scores in the AI-LLM-generated radiograph report, CT report, and MRI report. For all AI-LLM-generated reports, the mean reading level improved to below an eighth-grade reading level. The mean Likert score for the AI-LLM-generated radiograph report, CT report, and MRI report was 4.1 ± 0.6, 3.9 ± 0.6, and 3.9 ± 0.7, respectively. The hallucination rate in the AI-LLM-generated radiograph report, CT report, and MRI report was 3%, 6%, and 6%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that AI-LLM effectively improves the readability of hand and wrist radiology reports, underscoring the potential application of AI-LLM as a promising and innovative patient-centric strategy to improve patient comprehension of their imaging reports. Level of Evidence: IV.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app