We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of the slit-light method in the diagnosis of cyclotorsion.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of sensitivity and specificity of the slit-light (SL) method in the diagnosis of ocular cyclotorsion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty eyes of 60 individuals (10-60 years old), with mean visual acuity of 0.08 ± 0.14 LogMAR, were divided into two groups (normal and torsion groups). Individuals without ocular motility disorder were selected as normal and patients with extraocular motility disorders and oblique muscle dysfunctions as the torsion group. The sensitivity and specificity of SL in the diagnosis of ocular torsion were measured by masked investigators and compared to fundus photography (FP). Inter- and intraobserver variability of these techniques was also determined.
RESULTS: The amounts of sensitivity and specificity of SL, measured by the first examiner, were 60% and 92% for intorsion and 50% and 96% for extorsion assessment, respectively. These amounts were 53% and 95% for intorsion, and 54% and 97% for extorsion by the second examiner. The contingency coefficient between the two examiners was 68.6% for SL. This amount was 61% between FP and SL for the first examiner and 63% for the second. The contingency coefficient for the repeatability of SL was 72.2% for the first examiner and 75.7% for the second. This amount was 71.2% between the two examiners.
CONCLUSION: SL can be considered a useful method for the diagnosis of cyclotorsion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty eyes of 60 individuals (10-60 years old), with mean visual acuity of 0.08 ± 0.14 LogMAR, were divided into two groups (normal and torsion groups). Individuals without ocular motility disorder were selected as normal and patients with extraocular motility disorders and oblique muscle dysfunctions as the torsion group. The sensitivity and specificity of SL in the diagnosis of ocular torsion were measured by masked investigators and compared to fundus photography (FP). Inter- and intraobserver variability of these techniques was also determined.
RESULTS: The amounts of sensitivity and specificity of SL, measured by the first examiner, were 60% and 92% for intorsion and 50% and 96% for extorsion assessment, respectively. These amounts were 53% and 95% for intorsion, and 54% and 97% for extorsion by the second examiner. The contingency coefficient between the two examiners was 68.6% for SL. This amount was 61% between FP and SL for the first examiner and 63% for the second. The contingency coefficient for the repeatability of SL was 72.2% for the first examiner and 75.7% for the second. This amount was 71.2% between the two examiners.
CONCLUSION: SL can be considered a useful method for the diagnosis of cyclotorsion.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app