We have located links that may give you full text access.
Change in incidents of suicidal acts after intervention on a bridge in South Korea.
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2024 August 9
PURPOSE: To investigate whether two novel interventions on a bridge - a Video Incident Detection System (VIDS) and spinning bar barriers - have an impact on suicidal behaviour on the bridge.
METHODS: A total of 146 suicidal acts were retrieved for analyses; 108 interventions before suicidal acts, 35 suicide deaths and 3 suicide attempts. Incident rate ratios (IRR) were calculated to estimate the change in incident rate associated with implementation of the two interventions: VIDS and the spinning bar 2-metre high barrier.
RESULTS: The results of the Poisson regression showed that the rate of suicide deaths, after installation the VIDS, did not change significantly (IRR: 1.23, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 0.59-2.56), although the rate of intervened suicidal acts increased (IRR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.65-3.47). The results showed that subsequent spinning bar installation resulted in a decrease in the incident rate of intervened suicidal acts (IRR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.25-0.57) as well as suicide deaths (IRR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.71). Comparison of the period when both interventions were in place with the period with no interventions indicated a reduction in suicide deaths (IRR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.10-0.82), but no change in intervened suicidal acts (IRR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.59-1.38).
CONCLUSION: The rate of suicide death decreased after the installation of the spinning bar barrier but not after the implementation of VIDS alone. Our findings reinforce that restricting access to means is a highly effective way of preventing suicide on bridges and that spinning bars may be a helpful way to design barriers.
METHODS: A total of 146 suicidal acts were retrieved for analyses; 108 interventions before suicidal acts, 35 suicide deaths and 3 suicide attempts. Incident rate ratios (IRR) were calculated to estimate the change in incident rate associated with implementation of the two interventions: VIDS and the spinning bar 2-metre high barrier.
RESULTS: The results of the Poisson regression showed that the rate of suicide deaths, after installation the VIDS, did not change significantly (IRR: 1.23, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 0.59-2.56), although the rate of intervened suicidal acts increased (IRR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.65-3.47). The results showed that subsequent spinning bar installation resulted in a decrease in the incident rate of intervened suicidal acts (IRR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.25-0.57) as well as suicide deaths (IRR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.71). Comparison of the period when both interventions were in place with the period with no interventions indicated a reduction in suicide deaths (IRR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.10-0.82), but no change in intervened suicidal acts (IRR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.59-1.38).
CONCLUSION: The rate of suicide death decreased after the installation of the spinning bar barrier but not after the implementation of VIDS alone. Our findings reinforce that restricting access to means is a highly effective way of preventing suicide on bridges and that spinning bars may be a helpful way to design barriers.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app