We have located links that may give you full text access.
CT-based comprehensive scoring system for assessing hip arthropathy in ankylosing spondylitis: feasibility study with clinical correlation.
Rheumatology 2024 August 7
OBJECTIVE: To develop a CT-based scoring system for assessment of hip arthropathy in AS.
METHODS: All AS patients were prospectively recruited, consented, and underwent whole-body stereoradiographs and pelvis CT, which were assessed by two independent radiologists. Stereoradiographs were assessed according to Kellgreen-Lawrence and BASRI-h. For the Hip arthropathy CT score in AS (HACTSAS), joints were divided into 7 segments and scored for joint space, osteophytes, subchondral cysts/erosions. Patients were clinically assessed for range of motion (ROM), pain, and clinical scores (BASMI, BASFI, ASQol, BASDAI and ASDAS). Radiological scores correlations with clinical parameters were compared. ROM sensitivity and specificity for hip arthropathy (BASRI-h ≥ 2) were calculated.
RESULTS: Sample included 112 patients, with 36/112 females and 76/112 males. Average age was 51.0 ± 11.2 years and mean duration of AS was 20.9 ± 9.6 years. ICC for HACTSAS, Kellgreen-Lawrence and BASRI-h were 0.89, 0.89 and 0.82 respectively. HACTSAS showed moderate absolute correlation with ROM (ρ=-0.41) and BASMI (ρ = 0.45), and weak with pain (ρ = 0.18) and BASFI (ρ = 0.25). BASRI-h and Kellgreen-Lawrence exhibited moderate correlation with ROM (ρ=-0.44 and ρ=-0.40, respectively), weak with pain (ρ=-.27and ρ=-0.23, respectively) and BASFI (ρ=-0.16 and ρ=-0.18, respectively), but only weak with BASMI (ρ=-0.34 and ρ=-0.36, respectively). Internal rotation <15°, abduction <31°, and intermalleolar distance <75cm were, respectively, 73%, 70% and 73% sensitivity and 81%, 65% and 68% specific for hip arthropathy.
CONCLUSION: HACTSAS exhibited higher correlation with BASMI and BASFI when compared with BASRI-h, but less correlation with pain and ROM. Internal rotation was the best clinical discriminator for hip arthropathy.
METHODS: All AS patients were prospectively recruited, consented, and underwent whole-body stereoradiographs and pelvis CT, which were assessed by two independent radiologists. Stereoradiographs were assessed according to Kellgreen-Lawrence and BASRI-h. For the Hip arthropathy CT score in AS (HACTSAS), joints were divided into 7 segments and scored for joint space, osteophytes, subchondral cysts/erosions. Patients were clinically assessed for range of motion (ROM), pain, and clinical scores (BASMI, BASFI, ASQol, BASDAI and ASDAS). Radiological scores correlations with clinical parameters were compared. ROM sensitivity and specificity for hip arthropathy (BASRI-h ≥ 2) were calculated.
RESULTS: Sample included 112 patients, with 36/112 females and 76/112 males. Average age was 51.0 ± 11.2 years and mean duration of AS was 20.9 ± 9.6 years. ICC for HACTSAS, Kellgreen-Lawrence and BASRI-h were 0.89, 0.89 and 0.82 respectively. HACTSAS showed moderate absolute correlation with ROM (ρ=-0.41) and BASMI (ρ = 0.45), and weak with pain (ρ = 0.18) and BASFI (ρ = 0.25). BASRI-h and Kellgreen-Lawrence exhibited moderate correlation with ROM (ρ=-0.44 and ρ=-0.40, respectively), weak with pain (ρ=-.27and ρ=-0.23, respectively) and BASFI (ρ=-0.16 and ρ=-0.18, respectively), but only weak with BASMI (ρ=-0.34 and ρ=-0.36, respectively). Internal rotation <15°, abduction <31°, and intermalleolar distance <75cm were, respectively, 73%, 70% and 73% sensitivity and 81%, 65% and 68% specific for hip arthropathy.
CONCLUSION: HACTSAS exhibited higher correlation with BASMI and BASFI when compared with BASRI-h, but less correlation with pain and ROM. Internal rotation was the best clinical discriminator for hip arthropathy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app