We have located links that may give you full text access.
Perfluorocarbon liquid use during vitrectomy for macula-Off Retinal detachment has no impact on Macular folds and Metamorphopsia.
Retina 2024 August 1
PURPOSE: To compare two drainage techniques in macula-off retinal detachment (RD) surgery: perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL)-assisted drainage and partial subretinal fluid (SRF) drainage without PFCL. We investigated morphological and functional outcomes, focusing on metamorphopsia quantification.
METHODS: Eighty eyes with macula-off RD were retrospectively included. All underwent a 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. In the PFCL group, SRF drainage was performed using PFCL. In the partial SRF drainage (SRFD) group, SRF was partially drained through a pre-existing retinal break without PFCL. A follow-up at 3 and 6 months evaluated anatomical outcomes using optical coherence tomography (OCT), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and metamorphopsia quantified with M-charts.
RESULTS: Reattachment rates were comparable in the PFCL group (97.5%) and the SRFD group (95%) (p > 0.05). Mean BCVA (LogMAR) was 0.23 ± 0.32 (PFCL group) and 0.15 ± 0.13 (SRFD group) (p = 0.206). Metamorphopsia were reported by 19 patients (47.5%) in the PFCL group and by 12 patients (30%) in the SRFD group (p = 0.332). The mean metamorphopsia score was similar in both groups (0.27 ± 0.12 in the PFCL group and 0.28 ± 0.11 in the SRFD group, p = 0.866). Morphological OCT findings were comparable in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Morphological and functional outcomes were similar in PFCL and SRFD groups. Metamorphopsia quantification scores did not improve with PFCL. While both of these techniques might be effective and could be recommended for primary macula-off RD management, potential PFCL toxicity should be kept in mind and its use dedicated to selected cases.
METHODS: Eighty eyes with macula-off RD were retrospectively included. All underwent a 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. In the PFCL group, SRF drainage was performed using PFCL. In the partial SRF drainage (SRFD) group, SRF was partially drained through a pre-existing retinal break without PFCL. A follow-up at 3 and 6 months evaluated anatomical outcomes using optical coherence tomography (OCT), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and metamorphopsia quantified with M-charts.
RESULTS: Reattachment rates were comparable in the PFCL group (97.5%) and the SRFD group (95%) (p > 0.05). Mean BCVA (LogMAR) was 0.23 ± 0.32 (PFCL group) and 0.15 ± 0.13 (SRFD group) (p = 0.206). Metamorphopsia were reported by 19 patients (47.5%) in the PFCL group and by 12 patients (30%) in the SRFD group (p = 0.332). The mean metamorphopsia score was similar in both groups (0.27 ± 0.12 in the PFCL group and 0.28 ± 0.11 in the SRFD group, p = 0.866). Morphological OCT findings were comparable in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Morphological and functional outcomes were similar in PFCL and SRFD groups. Metamorphopsia quantification scores did not improve with PFCL. While both of these techniques might be effective and could be recommended for primary macula-off RD management, potential PFCL toxicity should be kept in mind and its use dedicated to selected cases.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Prevention and management of venous thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis.British Journal of Haematology 2024 August 26
Clinical Evaluation and Management of Thrombotic Microangiopathy.Arthritis & Rheumatology 2024 Februrary
Hodgkin lymphoma: 2025 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 September 6
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app