Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Appendicectomy: assessment of stump invagination versus simple ligation: a prospective, randomized trial.

The appendix stump was ligated and doubly invaginated in 374 patients and was simply ligated in 361 in a prospective, randomized trial of 735 consecutive appendicectomies. The two groups were similar with respect to sex, age, degree of appendiceal inflammation and antibiotic treatment. The incidence of wound infection and postoperative pyrexia and the postoperative hospital stay showed no significant intergroup difference. The median operating time was slightly shorter in the group without invagination. Simple ligation facilitates and shortens appendicectomy. It produces no deformation of the caecal wall that subsequently may be mistaken for a caecal neoplasm. Simple ligation is therefore recommended as standard procedure in appendicectomy.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app