We have located links that may give you full text access.
Restrictive versus Decision Support Guided Fluid Therapy During Major Hepatic Resection Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Anesthesiology 2024 July 25
BACKGROUND: Fluid therapy during major hepatic resection aims at minimizing fluids during the dissection phase to reduce central venous pressure (CVP), retrograde liver blood flow, and venous bleeding. This strategy, however, may lead to hyperlactatemia. The Acumen™ Assisted Fluid Management system uses novel decision support software whose algorithm helps clinicians optimize fluid therapy. We tested the hypothesis that using this decision support system could decrease arterial lactate at the end of major hepatic resection when compared to a more restrictive fluid strategy.
METHODS: This two-arm, prospective, randomized controlled, assessor-and patient-blinded superiority study included consecutive patients undergoing major liver surgery equipped with an arterial catheter linked to an uncalibrated stroke volume monitor. In the decision support group, fluid therapy was guided throughout the entire procedure using the assisted fluid management software. In the restrictive fluid group, clinicians were recommended to restrict fluid infusion to 1-2 ml.kg-1.h-1 until the completion of hepatectomy. They then administered fluids based on advanced hemodynamic variables. Noradrenaline was titrated in all patients to maintain a mean arterial pressure >65mmHg. The primary outcome was arterial lactate level upon completion of surgery (i.e., skin closure).
RESULTS: Ninety patients were enrolled over a 7-month period. The primary outcome was lower in the decision support group than in the restrictive group (median[Q1-Q3] 2.5[1.9-3.7]mmol.L-1 vs 4.6[3.1-5.4]mmol.L-1, median difference -2.1, 95%CI(-2.7,-1.2), p<0.001). Among secondary exploratory outcomes, there was no difference in blood loss (median[Q1-Q3] 450[300-600]ml vs 500[300-800]ml, p=0.727) although CVP was higher in the decision support group (mean (SD) of 7.7(2.0)mmHg vs 6.6(1.1)mmHg, p<0.002).
CONCLUSION: Patients managed using a clinical decision support system to guide fluid administration during major hepatic resection had a lower arterial lactate concentration at the end of surgery when compared to a more restrictive fluid strategy. Future trials are necessary to make conclusive recommendations that will change clinical practice.
METHODS: This two-arm, prospective, randomized controlled, assessor-and patient-blinded superiority study included consecutive patients undergoing major liver surgery equipped with an arterial catheter linked to an uncalibrated stroke volume monitor. In the decision support group, fluid therapy was guided throughout the entire procedure using the assisted fluid management software. In the restrictive fluid group, clinicians were recommended to restrict fluid infusion to 1-2 ml.kg-1.h-1 until the completion of hepatectomy. They then administered fluids based on advanced hemodynamic variables. Noradrenaline was titrated in all patients to maintain a mean arterial pressure >65mmHg. The primary outcome was arterial lactate level upon completion of surgery (i.e., skin closure).
RESULTS: Ninety patients were enrolled over a 7-month period. The primary outcome was lower in the decision support group than in the restrictive group (median[Q1-Q3] 2.5[1.9-3.7]mmol.L-1 vs 4.6[3.1-5.4]mmol.L-1, median difference -2.1, 95%CI(-2.7,-1.2), p<0.001). Among secondary exploratory outcomes, there was no difference in blood loss (median[Q1-Q3] 450[300-600]ml vs 500[300-800]ml, p=0.727) although CVP was higher in the decision support group (mean (SD) of 7.7(2.0)mmHg vs 6.6(1.1)mmHg, p<0.002).
CONCLUSION: Patients managed using a clinical decision support system to guide fluid administration during major hepatic resection had a lower arterial lactate concentration at the end of surgery when compared to a more restrictive fluid strategy. Future trials are necessary to make conclusive recommendations that will change clinical practice.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app