We have located links that may give you full text access.
Feasibility of a contraceptive-specific electronic health record system to promote the adoption of pharmacist-prescribed contraceptive services in community pharmacies in the United States.
JAMIA Open 2024 October
OBJECTIVES: Pharmacists in over half of the United States can prescribe contraceptives; however, low pharmacist adoption has impeded the full realization of potential public health benefits. Many barriers to adoption may be addressed by leveraging an electronic health records (EHR) system with clinical decision support tools and workflow automation. We conducted a feasibility study to determine if utilizing a contraceptive-specific EHR could improve potential barriers to the implementation of pharmacist-prescribed contraceptive services.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 pharmacists each performed two standardized patient encounter simulations: one on the EHR and one on the current standard of care paper-based workflow. A crossover study design was utilized, with each pharmacist performing encounters on both standardized patients with the modality order randomized. Encounters were timed, contraceptive outputs were recorded, and the pharmacists completed externally validated workload and usability surveys after each encounter, and a Perception, Attitude, and Satisfaction survey created by the research team after the final encounter.
RESULTS: Pharmacists were more likely to identify contraceptive ineligibility using the EHR-based workflow compared to the paper workflow ( P = .003). Contraceptive encounter time was not significantly different between the 2 modalities ( P = .280). Pharmacists reported lower mental demand ( P = .003) and greater perceived usefulness ( P = .029) with the EHR-based workflow compared to the paper modality.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Pharmacist performance and acceptance of contraceptive services delivery were improved with the EHR workflow. Pharmacist-specific contraceptive EHR workflows show potential to improve pharmacist adoption and provision of appropriate contraceptive care.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 pharmacists each performed two standardized patient encounter simulations: one on the EHR and one on the current standard of care paper-based workflow. A crossover study design was utilized, with each pharmacist performing encounters on both standardized patients with the modality order randomized. Encounters were timed, contraceptive outputs were recorded, and the pharmacists completed externally validated workload and usability surveys after each encounter, and a Perception, Attitude, and Satisfaction survey created by the research team after the final encounter.
RESULTS: Pharmacists were more likely to identify contraceptive ineligibility using the EHR-based workflow compared to the paper workflow ( P = .003). Contraceptive encounter time was not significantly different between the 2 modalities ( P = .280). Pharmacists reported lower mental demand ( P = .003) and greater perceived usefulness ( P = .029) with the EHR-based workflow compared to the paper modality.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Pharmacist performance and acceptance of contraceptive services delivery were improved with the EHR workflow. Pharmacist-specific contraceptive EHR workflows show potential to improve pharmacist adoption and provision of appropriate contraceptive care.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app