We have located links that may give you full text access.
Risk Factors for Patellofemoral Pain in the Military: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Journal of Athletic Training 2024 July 15
BACKGROUND: The main cause for attrition of military training is musculoskeletal injuries to the knee, such as patellofemoral pain (PFP).
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to identify which factors increase the risk of occurrence of PFP in military personnel.
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES: Searches were performed in Medline/PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Scopus, and OpenGray.
STUDY SELECTION: We included studies that were prospective cohorts including military personnel and had at least one variable assessing a risk factor for PFP.
DATA EXTRACTION: Extraction was performed by the same two independent evaluators and the data was separated between the military personnel who developed PFP and those who did not.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Meta-analyses were performed using standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) and the levels of recommendation were determined.
RESULTS: From 11 articles, this review grouped 7,518 military personnel, of which 572 developed PFP, characterizing a prevalence of 7.61%. We found moderate evidence that isokinetic knee extensor weakness predicts PFP in the military (SMD -0.69, 95%CI -1.02, -0.35). A higher frontal plane knee projection angle (FPKPA) during single-leg squat was also identified as a risk factor for PFP in this population (SMD 0.55, 95%CI 0.14, 0.97) with moderate level of evidence. We found moderate evidence that sex, body mass index, isometric knee extensors strength, and isokinetic knee flexors strength do not predict PFP in military personnel. Finally, there is strong evidence that age and body mass do not predict PFP in this population.
CONCLUSIONS: Deficits in isokinetic knee extensor strength and a greater FPKPA are risk factors for PFP in military personnel. Since these are modifiable factors, these aspects should be considered in injury prevention interventions in the military.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to identify which factors increase the risk of occurrence of PFP in military personnel.
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES: Searches were performed in Medline/PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Scopus, and OpenGray.
STUDY SELECTION: We included studies that were prospective cohorts including military personnel and had at least one variable assessing a risk factor for PFP.
DATA EXTRACTION: Extraction was performed by the same two independent evaluators and the data was separated between the military personnel who developed PFP and those who did not.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Meta-analyses were performed using standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) and the levels of recommendation were determined.
RESULTS: From 11 articles, this review grouped 7,518 military personnel, of which 572 developed PFP, characterizing a prevalence of 7.61%. We found moderate evidence that isokinetic knee extensor weakness predicts PFP in the military (SMD -0.69, 95%CI -1.02, -0.35). A higher frontal plane knee projection angle (FPKPA) during single-leg squat was also identified as a risk factor for PFP in this population (SMD 0.55, 95%CI 0.14, 0.97) with moderate level of evidence. We found moderate evidence that sex, body mass index, isometric knee extensors strength, and isokinetic knee flexors strength do not predict PFP in military personnel. Finally, there is strong evidence that age and body mass do not predict PFP in this population.
CONCLUSIONS: Deficits in isokinetic knee extensor strength and a greater FPKPA are risk factors for PFP in military personnel. Since these are modifiable factors, these aspects should be considered in injury prevention interventions in the military.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Prevention and management of venous thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis.British Journal of Haematology 2024 August 26
Clinical Evaluation and Management of Thrombotic Microangiopathy.Arthritis & Rheumatology 2024 Februrary
Hodgkin lymphoma: 2025 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 September 6
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app