Long-term outcomes of the BalMedic bovine pericardial bioprosthetic valve in female patients ≤50 years: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: A bioprosthetic valve is recommended for women of childbearing age who require cardiac valve replacement in order to minimize the risk of blood clot formation. However, it should be noted that compared to mechanical valves, bioprosthetic valves have a shorter lifespan and a higher likelihood of requiring reoperation during follow-up. To assess the long-term postoperative results, including the incidence of structural valve deterioration (SVD) and other clinical outcomes, in female patients aged 50 years and younger who underwent BalMedic bovine pericardial bioprosthetic valve replacement, a multicenter retrospective study was implemented in China.

METHODS: Between 2004 and 2015, a cohort of 86 female patients across three medical centers underwent the implantation of 97 bioprosthetic valves. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS), while the secondary outcome measures were preliminary evidence of reoperation, SVD incidence, and bioprosthetic valve-related complications.

RESULTS: In this cohort study, 21 patients (24.4%, 21/86) died, while 37 patients (43.0%, 37/86) underwent a second valve replacement. The OS rates at 5 and 10 years were 97.56% and 71.93%, respectively. Additionally, the reoperation-free rates at 5 and 10 years were 92.83% and 80.68%, respectively. Similarly, the rates of freedom from SVD at 5 and 10 years were 95.65% and 51.82%, respectively, and the average duration of bioprosthetic valve replacement in our study was 9.34±3.31 years.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite the recruitment of younger female patients of child-bearing age in our cohort, the OS, reoperation-free survival, and SVD-free rates of the BalMedic bovine pericardial bioprosthetic valve were not inferior to those of the other age groups in the study or those reported in the literature.