We have located links that may give you full text access.
Analysis of IgG subclass staining for IgG immunofluorescence-positive IgA nephropathy.
Clinical Nephrology 2024 September
AIMS: The clinicopathological significance of IgG subclass staining is unclear in IgG immunofluorescence (IF)-positive IgA nephropathy (IgAN). This study investigated IgG subclass distribution in IgG IF-positive IgAN by IF staining and examined their clinicopathological significance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2020, 27 biopsies from 26 patients with IgG IF-positive IgAN who were IF-positive for any IgG subclass staining were collected. We compared the clinicopathological findings between cases with and without IF positivity for each IgG subclass.
RESULTS: Of the 27 biopsies with IgG IF-positive IgAN, 20 (74.1%) were IF-positive for IgG1, 10 (37.0%) were positive for IgG2, 7 (25.9%) were positive for IgG3, and none were positive for IgG4. Oxford E and C scores were significantly higher in cases of IgG IF-positive IgAN than IgG IF-negative IgAN. The age at biopsy had a negative correlation with IgG1 IF intensity (γ = -0.604, p = 0.001). The levels of proteinuria and microscopic hematuria as well as Oxford classification score were not significantly different between cases with or without positive staining for each IgG subclass. IgG IF intensity had a positive correlation with IgG1 IF intensity (γ = 0.741, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: IgG1-positive IF staining intensity was highest among each IgG subclass in IgG IF-positive IgAN biopsies. A negative correlation was revealed between the age at biopsy and IgG1 IF intensity. Oxford E and C scores were higher in patients with IgG IF-positive IgAN than in those with IgG IF-negative IgAN. The Oxford score was not significantly different between the IgG subclasses, but the IF intensity of IgG had a positive correlation with the IF intensity of IgG1 in IgG IF-positive IgAN biopsies. Further studies should assess relationships between IgG subclass IF deposition and examine the pathogenesis of IgAN.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2020, 27 biopsies from 26 patients with IgG IF-positive IgAN who were IF-positive for any IgG subclass staining were collected. We compared the clinicopathological findings between cases with and without IF positivity for each IgG subclass.
RESULTS: Of the 27 biopsies with IgG IF-positive IgAN, 20 (74.1%) were IF-positive for IgG1, 10 (37.0%) were positive for IgG2, 7 (25.9%) were positive for IgG3, and none were positive for IgG4. Oxford E and C scores were significantly higher in cases of IgG IF-positive IgAN than IgG IF-negative IgAN. The age at biopsy had a negative correlation with IgG1 IF intensity (γ = -0.604, p = 0.001). The levels of proteinuria and microscopic hematuria as well as Oxford classification score were not significantly different between cases with or without positive staining for each IgG subclass. IgG IF intensity had a positive correlation with IgG1 IF intensity (γ = 0.741, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: IgG1-positive IF staining intensity was highest among each IgG subclass in IgG IF-positive IgAN biopsies. A negative correlation was revealed between the age at biopsy and IgG1 IF intensity. Oxford E and C scores were higher in patients with IgG IF-positive IgAN than in those with IgG IF-negative IgAN. The Oxford score was not significantly different between the IgG subclasses, but the IF intensity of IgG had a positive correlation with the IF intensity of IgG1 in IgG IF-positive IgAN biopsies. Further studies should assess relationships between IgG subclass IF deposition and examine the pathogenesis of IgAN.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app