We have located links that may give you full text access.
Validation of Different Dementia Code-based Definitions in a Population-based Study of Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Journal of Rheumatology 2024 July 1
OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with an elevated dementia risk. The study aimed to examine how different diagnostic dementia definitions perform in those with RA compared to individuals without RA.
METHODS: This study population included 2050 individuals (1025 with RA) from a retrospective population-based cohort in southern Minnesota and compared the performance of three code-based dementia diagnostic algorithms with medical record review diagnosis of dementia. For the overall comparison, no time frames were used, and each patient's complete medical history was used. Sensitivity analyses were performed using 1, 2, and 5-year windows around the date that dementia was identified in the medical record (reference standard).
RESULTS: Algorithms performed very similarly in persons with and without RA. The algorithms generally had high specificity, negative predictive values, and accuracy, regardless of the time window studied (>88%). Sensitivity and positive predictive values varied depending on the algorithm and the time window studied. Sensitivity values ranged from 56.5% to 95.9%, and positive predictive values ranged from 55.2% to 83.1%. Performance measures declined with more restrictive time windows.
CONCLUSION: Routinely collected electronic health record (EHR) data was used to define code-based dementia diagnosis algorithms with good performance (vs. diagnosis by medical record review). These results can inform future studies that use retrospective databases (especially in the same or similar EHR infrastructure) to identify dementia in individuals with RA.
METHODS: This study population included 2050 individuals (1025 with RA) from a retrospective population-based cohort in southern Minnesota and compared the performance of three code-based dementia diagnostic algorithms with medical record review diagnosis of dementia. For the overall comparison, no time frames were used, and each patient's complete medical history was used. Sensitivity analyses were performed using 1, 2, and 5-year windows around the date that dementia was identified in the medical record (reference standard).
RESULTS: Algorithms performed very similarly in persons with and without RA. The algorithms generally had high specificity, negative predictive values, and accuracy, regardless of the time window studied (>88%). Sensitivity and positive predictive values varied depending on the algorithm and the time window studied. Sensitivity values ranged from 56.5% to 95.9%, and positive predictive values ranged from 55.2% to 83.1%. Performance measures declined with more restrictive time windows.
CONCLUSION: Routinely collected electronic health record (EHR) data was used to define code-based dementia diagnosis algorithms with good performance (vs. diagnosis by medical record review). These results can inform future studies that use retrospective databases (especially in the same or similar EHR infrastructure) to identify dementia in individuals with RA.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Novel Insights into Diabetic Kidney Disease.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 September 23
Perioperative fluid management: evidence-based consensus recommendations from the international multidisciplinary PeriOperative Quality Initiative.British Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 September 27
Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors for adults with chronic kidney disease: a clinical practice guideline.BMJ : British Medical Journal 2024 October 1
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app