The value of ripple mapping in the age of coherent mapping in scar-related atrial tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: An accurate display of scar-related atrial tachycardia (ATs) is a key determinant of ablation success. The efficacy of ripple mapping (RM) in identifying the mechanism and critical isthmus of scar-related ATs during coherent mapping is unknown.

METHODS: A total of 97 patients with complex ATs who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation at our center between October 2018 and September 2022 were included. ATs was mapped using a multielectrode mapping catheter on the CARTO3v7 CONFIDENCE module. Coherent and RM were used to identify the reentrant circuit.

RESULTS: The mechanisms of 128 ATs were analyzed retrospectively (84 anatomic-reentrant ATs and 44 non-anatomic reentrant ATs). The median AT cycle length was 264 ± 25ms. The correct diagnosis was achieved in 83 ATs (68%) using only coherent mapping. Through coherent mapping plus RM, 114 ATs (84.2%) were correctly diagnosed (68% vs. 89%, p = .019). In non-anatomical reentrant ATs, 81% of the diagnostic rate was achieved by reviewing both coherent and ripple mapping compared to reviewing coherent mapping alone (81% vs. 52%, p = .03). Reviewing coherent mapping and ripple mapping showed a higher diagnostic rate in patients who underwent cardiac surgery than those with Coherent mapping alone (64% vs. 88%, p = .04).

CONCLUSION: Coherent mapping combined with RM was superior to coherent mapping alone in identifying the mechanism of scar-related ATs post-cardiac surgery and non-anatomic reentrant ATs.