We have located links that may give you full text access.
The Typical Nail lichen planus severity index (tNLPSI):an outcome instrument for typical nail lichen planus.
INTRODUCTION: Despite numerous treatment options for Nail lichen planus (NLP), a validated method for measuring the severity of NLP and therapeutic response in clinical trials is absent. To develop and validate a measurement instrument (tNLPSI - typical nail lichen planus severity index) for typical nail lichen planus that could be used in clinical trials.
METHODS: 48 patients with typical NLP diagnosed pathologically and 5 dermatologists participated. The physicians were trained to use the tNLPSI activity scale and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). Using both tools, 5 physicians scored samples independently to estimate inter-rater reliability and intra-rater reliability in two sessions. In addition, tNLPSI activity scores were compared with physician global assessment (PGA) scores.
RESULTS: The tNLPSI activity scale had excellent internal consistency and interrater reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.990; ICC= 0.954; 95% CI= 0.930-0.971), and the correlations between the different graders' scores indicate good consistent (rp=0.934-0.968. In addition, the tNLPSI activity scale demonstrated high intra-rater reliability (ICC=0.996; 95% CI= 0.993-0.998), showing good reproducibility. And tNLPSI activity scores and PGA scores showed good construct validity (Spearman's rho= 0.941 and Spearman's rho= 0.903-0.935, respectively; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The tNLPSI activity scale was demonstrated to be consistent, reliable, reproducible, and feasible. It may prove to be a valuable tool in evaluating the treatment response in typical NLP clinical trials.
METHODS: 48 patients with typical NLP diagnosed pathologically and 5 dermatologists participated. The physicians were trained to use the tNLPSI activity scale and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). Using both tools, 5 physicians scored samples independently to estimate inter-rater reliability and intra-rater reliability in two sessions. In addition, tNLPSI activity scores were compared with physician global assessment (PGA) scores.
RESULTS: The tNLPSI activity scale had excellent internal consistency and interrater reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.990; ICC= 0.954; 95% CI= 0.930-0.971), and the correlations between the different graders' scores indicate good consistent (rp=0.934-0.968. In addition, the tNLPSI activity scale demonstrated high intra-rater reliability (ICC=0.996; 95% CI= 0.993-0.998), showing good reproducibility. And tNLPSI activity scores and PGA scores showed good construct validity (Spearman's rho= 0.941 and Spearman's rho= 0.903-0.935, respectively; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The tNLPSI activity scale was demonstrated to be consistent, reliable, reproducible, and feasible. It may prove to be a valuable tool in evaluating the treatment response in typical NLP clinical trials.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app