We have located links that may give you full text access.
Physical pain among urban Native American emerging adults: Socio-cultural risk and protective factors.
Psychosomatic Medicine 2024 May 24
OBJECTIVE: American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) people have high rates of physical pain. Pain is understudied in urban-dwelling, AI/AN emerging adults, a group with unique socio-cultural risk and protective factors. We explore associations between socioeconomic disadvantage, additional socio-cultural factors, and pain among urban AI/AN emerging adults.
METHODS: AI/AN participants aged 18-25 (N = 417) were recruited via social media. Regression models tested associations between socioeconomic disadvantage (income and ability to afford healthcare) and pain as well as additional socio-cultural factors (discrimination, historical loss, cultural pride and belonging, visiting tribal lands) and pain. Multi-group regression models tested whether associations between socio-cultural factors and pain differed between participants who were socioeconomically disadvantaged and those who were less disadvantaged.
RESULTS: In the full sample, lower income (b = 1.00 - 1.48, p < .05), inability to afford healthcare (b = 1.00, p = .011), discrimination (b = 0.12, p = .001), and historical loss (b = 0.24, p = .006) were positively associated with pain, whereas visiting tribal lands was negatively associated with pain (b = -0.86 - -0.42, p < .05). In the multi-group model, visiting tribal lands 31+ days was negatively associated with pain only among the less socioeconomically disadvantaged group (b = -1.48, p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic disadvantage may, in part, drive pain disparities among AI/AN emerging adults and act as a barrier to benefitting from visiting tribal lands. Results support a biopsychosocial approach to targeting pain in this population, including addressing socioeconomic challenges and developing culturally informed, strengths-based interventions.
METHODS: AI/AN participants aged 18-25 (N = 417) were recruited via social media. Regression models tested associations between socioeconomic disadvantage (income and ability to afford healthcare) and pain as well as additional socio-cultural factors (discrimination, historical loss, cultural pride and belonging, visiting tribal lands) and pain. Multi-group regression models tested whether associations between socio-cultural factors and pain differed between participants who were socioeconomically disadvantaged and those who were less disadvantaged.
RESULTS: In the full sample, lower income (b = 1.00 - 1.48, p < .05), inability to afford healthcare (b = 1.00, p = .011), discrimination (b = 0.12, p = .001), and historical loss (b = 0.24, p = .006) were positively associated with pain, whereas visiting tribal lands was negatively associated with pain (b = -0.86 - -0.42, p < .05). In the multi-group model, visiting tribal lands 31+ days was negatively associated with pain only among the less socioeconomically disadvantaged group (b = -1.48, p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic disadvantage may, in part, drive pain disparities among AI/AN emerging adults and act as a barrier to benefitting from visiting tribal lands. Results support a biopsychosocial approach to targeting pain in this population, including addressing socioeconomic challenges and developing culturally informed, strengths-based interventions.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app