We have located links that may give you full text access.
Diagnostic value of uric acid to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Annals of Medicine 2024 December
BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is highly lethal upon onset of acute aortic diseases (AAD) or rupture. Dyslipidaemia and hyperuricaemia are important risk factors for the development of AAA and AAD as well as aortic disease-related death. The aim of this study was to explore whether uric acid (UA) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (UHR) can be used as an independent predictor of the presence of AAA or AAD.
METHODS: Three hundred subjects, including 100 AAA patients (AAA group), 100 AAD patients (AAD group) and 100 controls (CON group), were recruited in this study. UHR and other serum samples were obtained upon the patients' admission before any medical treatment. The optimal cut-off points of UHR were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
RESULTS: The UHR in AAA group was significantly higher than that in CON group, but there was no significant difference between AAD group and CON group. The optimal cut-off point of UHR for AAA was 7.78 (sensitivity 84.7%, specificity 62.4%, and AUC 0.811; p < 0.001), and UHR (OR: 1.122, 95%CI: 1.064-1.184; p < 0.001) was found to be an independent factor for predicting AAA after adjusting for traditional AAA risk factor.
CONCLUSION: UHR can be widely used in clinical practice as an auxiliary tool for screening AAA. The optimal cut-off point for UHR to AAA was determined for the first time in Chinese subjects.
METHODS: Three hundred subjects, including 100 AAA patients (AAA group), 100 AAD patients (AAD group) and 100 controls (CON group), were recruited in this study. UHR and other serum samples were obtained upon the patients' admission before any medical treatment. The optimal cut-off points of UHR were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
RESULTS: The UHR in AAA group was significantly higher than that in CON group, but there was no significant difference between AAD group and CON group. The optimal cut-off point of UHR for AAA was 7.78 (sensitivity 84.7%, specificity 62.4%, and AUC 0.811; p < 0.001), and UHR (OR: 1.122, 95%CI: 1.064-1.184; p < 0.001) was found to be an independent factor for predicting AAA after adjusting for traditional AAA risk factor.
CONCLUSION: UHR can be widely used in clinical practice as an auxiliary tool for screening AAA. The optimal cut-off point for UHR to AAA was determined for the first time in Chinese subjects.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app