We have located links that may give you full text access.
The Targeted Motor Control Screening Tool is Valid for Four-Year-Old Children.
Physical Therapy 2024 May 14
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the validity of the Targeted Motor Control (TMC) screening tool with the Neurosensory Motor Developmental Assessment (NSMDA) in 4-year-old children.
METHODS: In this single cohort observational study, children (3 years 9 months to 4 years 5 months) completed the TMC and the NSMDA in a randomized order 5 to 14 days apart.
RESULTS: Seventy-six children (mean age = 4 years 2 months; SD = 2.5 months; n = 35 male) completed both assessments. Forty-two children performed within the normal range on the NSMDA. There were significant and positive moderate correlations between item totals overall and for each area on the NSMDA and the TMC (r = 0.40 to 0.61) and between the NSMDA functional grade for each area and the corresponding TMC areas (r = 0.47 to 0.67). However, the correlation between the NSMDA sensorimotor functional grade and the TMC sensory score was significant but low and positive (r = 0.35). The optimal cut-off score for detecting children at risk of atypical development on the TMC was a score of <9 (n = 42) (sensitivity = 82.4%; specificity = 66.7%) with a positive likelihood ratio of 2.47 (95% CI = 1.57 to 3.89) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.26 (95% CI = 0.12 to 0.56).
CONCLUSIONS: The TMC is a valid screening tool to identify 4-year-old children at risk of motor delay.
IMPACT: Early identification of developmental concerns using a validated screening tool is recommended. The TMC is a valid performance-based screening tool that can be used to identify children at risk of atypical motor development who would benefit from further developmental assessment so that, if indicated, timely intervention can be implemented.
METHODS: In this single cohort observational study, children (3 years 9 months to 4 years 5 months) completed the TMC and the NSMDA in a randomized order 5 to 14 days apart.
RESULTS: Seventy-six children (mean age = 4 years 2 months; SD = 2.5 months; n = 35 male) completed both assessments. Forty-two children performed within the normal range on the NSMDA. There were significant and positive moderate correlations between item totals overall and for each area on the NSMDA and the TMC (r = 0.40 to 0.61) and between the NSMDA functional grade for each area and the corresponding TMC areas (r = 0.47 to 0.67). However, the correlation between the NSMDA sensorimotor functional grade and the TMC sensory score was significant but low and positive (r = 0.35). The optimal cut-off score for detecting children at risk of atypical development on the TMC was a score of <9 (n = 42) (sensitivity = 82.4%; specificity = 66.7%) with a positive likelihood ratio of 2.47 (95% CI = 1.57 to 3.89) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.26 (95% CI = 0.12 to 0.56).
CONCLUSIONS: The TMC is a valid screening tool to identify 4-year-old children at risk of motor delay.
IMPACT: Early identification of developmental concerns using a validated screening tool is recommended. The TMC is a valid performance-based screening tool that can be used to identify children at risk of atypical motor development who would benefit from further developmental assessment so that, if indicated, timely intervention can be implemented.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app